[PEEK cage fusion after anterior cervical corpectomy : Clinical and radiological results in patients with spondylotic myelopathy].

Orthopade

Abt. Neurochirurgie, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.

Published: March 2017

Background: Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) has become a standard procedure for patients with spondylotic myelopathy due to multisegmental stenosis of the cervical canal. In addition to the fusion technique using autogenous bone grafts and titanium implants, synthetic polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have been used increasingly during the last years. However, limited evidence on the clinical and radiological results of PEEK cages for ACCF exists in the literature. The study presented here is the largest series to date reporting clinical and radiological outcome as well as complication rates after one to three-level ACCF using PEEK cages augmented by an anterior plate-screw osteosynthesis.

Materials And Methods: Retrospective study on 101 patients after stand-alone PEEK cage-ACCF with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The number of hardware failures and implant-related surgical revisions were determined. The rate of subsidence and fusion and the course of lordotic alignment were analysed. The neck disability index (NDI) and the European myelopathy score (EMS) were assessed.

Results: Screw complications were detected in 8/101 cases and 3 cases of cage dislocation occurred, resulting in an overall implant related revision rate of 2.9 % (all revision cases showed cage dislocation). The rate of cage subsidence >3 mm was 12 % and solid fusion was achieved in 82 % of the patients. NDI, EMS and lordotic alignment improved significantly.

Conclusions: PEEK cages are a safe and effective alternative to titanium cages or autogenous bone graft for ACCF. Further randomized evaluation of different fusion techniques in ACCF is still necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-016-3345-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peek cages
16
clinical radiological
12
anterior cervical
8
cervical corpectomy
8
patients spondylotic
8
autogenous bone
8
lordotic alignment
8
cage dislocation
8
fusion
6
accf
5

Similar Publications

Evaluation of Healthcare Outcomes of Patients Treated with 3D-Printed-Titanium and PEEK Cages During Fusion Procedures in the Lumbar Spine.

Med Devices (Auckl)

January 2025

MedTech Epidemiology and Real-World Data Science, Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, Massachusetts & New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Purpose: The objective of this observational, real-world study was to describe reoperation, revision, index healthcare utilization and hospital costs among patients treated with PEEK (polyetheretherketone) or 3D-printed-titanium cages during lumbar/lumbosacral posterior fusion procedures, either TLIF (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) or PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion). Statistical comparisons were not conducted.

Methods: This was a descriptive, retrospective, observational study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

3D printed titanium banana interbody cages versus titanium-coated PEEK bullet cages for TLIF.

Clin Neurol Neurosurg

January 2025

Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.

Introduction: Lumbar degenerative spinal disease is a common, major cause of pain and disability. Titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are popular materials for interbody implants although evidence is mixed on which material is superior in terms of fusion and subsidence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of 3D printed titanium (3DPT) cages in patients undergoing TLIFs, as well as complication profiles based on widely used outcome metrics and reoperation events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cage subsidence can negatively affect lumbar fusion procedures, with material selection (PEEK vs. 3D-Ti) influencing this issue; the study aims to compare their subsidence rates.
  • The systematic search reviewed 265 patients from three high-quality studies, focusing on cage subsidence and classified subsidence rates using a specific method.
  • Results indicated that 3D-Ti cages have a significantly lower rate of subsidence compared to PEEK cages, with less severe subsidence and better overall performance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Context: Cage subsidence is a complication of interbody fusion associated with poor clinical outcomes. 3D-printed titanium interbody cages allow for the alteration of features such as stiffness and porosity. However, the influence of these features on subsidence and their biological effects on fusion have not been rigorously evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chronic low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease is a significant public health issue worldwide, contributing to substantial health care burdens and patient disability. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has emerged as a promising surgical solution, offering benefits such as disc height restoration, reduced neural compression, and improved spinal alignment. This study evaluates the efficacy of stand-alone ALIF using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages, structural femoral head allografts, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in treating discogenic low back pain caused by degenerative disc disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!