AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to assess the pharmacokinetics (how the body processes the drug), pharmacodynamics (effects of the drug), nasal tolerance, and sedation effects of an intranasal midazolam formulation called Nazolam compared to intravenous midazolam.
  • In a controlled trial with 16 participants, different doses of Nazolam and intravenous midazolam were administered, and various sedation outcomes were measured alongside monitoring nasal tolerance.
  • Results showed that Nazolam is effective in sedation with good bioavailability and no nasal mucosa damage, suggesting it could be a beneficial alternative to intravenous midazolam for conscious sedation due to its quicker administration and similar effects.

Article Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, nasal tolerance and effects on sedation of a highly concentrated aqueous intranasal midazolam formulation (Nazolam) and to compare these to intravenous midazolam.

Methods: In this four-way crossover, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 16 subjects received 2.5 mg Nazolam, 5.0 mg Nazolam, 2.5 mg intravenous midazolam or placebo on different occasions. Pharmacokinetics of midazolam and α-hydroxy-midazolam were characterized and related to outcome variables for sedation (saccadic peak velocity, the Bond and Lader visual analogue scale for sedation, the simple reaction time task and the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation). Nasal tolerance was evaluated through subject reporting, and ear, nose and throat examination.

Results: Nazolam bioavailability was 75%. Maximal plasma concentrations of 31 ng ml (CV, 42.3%) were reached after 11 min (2.5 mg Nazolam), and of 66 ng ml (coefficient of variability, 31.5%) after 14 min (5.0 mg Nazolam). Nazolam displayed a significant effect on OAA/S scores. Sedation onset (based on SPV change) occurred 1 ± 0.7 min after administration of 2.5 mg intravenous midazolam, 7 ± 4.4 min after 2.5 mg Nazolam, and 4 ± 1.8 min after 5 mg Nazolam. Sedation duration was 118 ± 95.6 min for 2.5 mg intravenous midazolam, 76 ± 80.4 min for 2.5 mg Nazolam, and 145 ± 104.9 min for 5.0 mg Nazolam. Nazolam did not lead to nasal mucosa damage.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the nasal tolerance, safety and efficacy of Nazolam. When considering the preparation time needed for obtaining venous access, conscious sedation can be achieved in the same time span as needed for intravenous midazolam. Nazolam may offer important advantages in conscious sedation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346864PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13163DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

25 mg nazolam
16
intravenous midazolam
16
nazolam
14
conscious sedation
12
nasal tolerance
12
50 mg nazolam
12
25 mg intravenous
12
pharmacokinetics pharmacodynamics
8
highly concentrated
8
intranasal midazolam
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!