A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Psychophysical Vision Simulation of Diffractive Bifocal and Trifocal Intraocular Lenses. | LitMetric

Purpose: The visual performance of monofocal, bifocal, and trifocal intraocular lenses was evaluated by human individuals using a vision simulator device. This allowed investigation of the visual impression after cataract surgery, without the need actually to implant the lenses.

Methods: The randomized, double-masked, three-way cross-over study was conducted on 60 healthy male and female subjects aged between 18 and 35 years. Visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; ETDRS) and contrast sensitivity tests (Pelli-Robson) under different lighting conditions (luminosities from 0.14-55 cd/m, mesopic to photopic) were performed at different distances.

Results: Visual acuity tests showed no difference for corrected distance visual acuity data of bi- and trifocal lens prototypes ( 0.851), but better results for the trifocal than for the bifocal lenses at distance corrected intermediate ( 0.021) and distance corrected near visual acuity ( 0.044). Contrast sensitivity showed no differences between bifocal and trifocal lenses at the distant ( = 0.984) and at the near position ( 0.925), but better results for the trifocal lens at the intermediate position ( 0.043). Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity showed a strong dependence on luminosity ( 0.001).

Conclusions: At all investigated distances and all lighting conditions, the trifocal lens prototype often performed better, but never worse than the bifocal lens prototype.

Translational Relevance: The vision simulator can fill the gap between preclinical lens development and implantation studies by providing information of the perceived vision quality after cataract surgery without implantation. This can reduce implantation risks and promotes the development of new lens concepts due to the cost effective test procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072543PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.5.13DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visual acuity
20
bifocal trifocal
12
contrast sensitivity
12
trifocal lens
12
trifocal intraocular
8
intraocular lenses
8
vision simulator
8
cataract surgery
8
lighting conditions
8
better trifocal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!