A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Gene Expression Profiling and Molecular Signaling of Various Cells in Response to Tricalcium Silicate Cements: A Systematic Review. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to review how different cell types (not including dental pulp cells) express genes when exposed to various tricalcium silicate cements (TSCs).
  • A total of 41 studies were analyzed, highlighting that ProRoot MTA was the most researched TSC variant, and 11 different cell types, including osteoblasts, were examined for gene expression changes.
  • Findings showed that cells exposed to TSCs consistently demonstrated significantly increased gene expression compared to untreated controls, indicating that TSCs positively influence cellular responses relevant for periapical healing.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to present a systematic review investigating the gene expression of various cells (other than dental pulp cells) in response to different variants of tricalcium silicate cements (TSCs).

Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed by 2 independent reviewers followed by article selection and data extraction. Studies analyzing any cell type except dental pulp stem cells and any variant of tricalcium silicate cement either as the experimental or as the control group were included.

Results: A total of 41 relevant articles were included in this review. Among the included studies, ProRoot MTA (Dentsply, Tulsa, OK) was the most commonly studied (69.1%) TSC variant, and 11 cell types were identified, with 13 articles investigating gene expression in osteoblasts. A total of 39 different genes/molecules expressed were found in the selected studies. The experimental group (irrespective of the TSC variant) was identified to express significantly increased gene expression compared with the control group (untreated) in all included studies. Recent studies have provided useful insight into the gene expression and molecular signaling of various cells in response to TSCs, and new elements have been supplied on the pathways activated in this process.

Conclusions: TSCs are capable of eliciting a favorable cellular response in periapical regeneration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gene expression
20
cells response
12
tricalcium silicate
12
molecular signaling
8
signaling cells
8
silicate cements
8
systematic review
8
investigating gene
8
dental pulp
8
control group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!