AI Article Synopsis

  • This study developed a hand-to-hand (HH) model for estimating fat-free mass (FFM) using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and compared it with the standing hand-to-foot (HF) model and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
  • Involving 704 healthy Chinese participants (403 men and 301 women), researchers calculated regression equations for FFM based on factors like height, weight, and age, achieving good correlation and agreement in results.
  • Both hand-to-hand and hand-to-foot BIA models showed similar reliability, indicating that the HH model is a practical alternative for measuring FFM.

Article Abstract

This study aimed to establish a hand-to-hand (HH) model for bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) fat free mass (FFM) estimation by comparing with a standing position hand-to-foot (HF) BIA model and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); we also verified the reliability of the newly developed model. A total of 704 healthy Chinese individuals (403 men and 301 women) participated. FFM (FFM) reference variables were measured using DXA and segmental BIA. Further, regression analysis, Bland-Altman plots, and cross-validation (2/3 participants as the modeling group, 1/3 as the validation group; three turns were repeated for validation grouping) were conducted to compare tests of agreement with FFM reference variables. In male participants, the hand-to-hand BIA model estimation equation was calculated as follows: FFM = 0.537 h²/Z - 0.126 year + 0.217 weight + 18.235 (² = 0.919, standard estimate of error (SEE) = 2.164 kg, = 269). The mean validated correlation coefficients and limits of agreement (LOAs) of the Bland-Altman analysis of the calculated values for FFM and FFM were 0.958 and -4.369-4.343 kg, respectively, for hand-to-foot BIA model measurements for men; the FFM (FFM) and FFM were 0.958 and -4.356-4.375 kg, respectively. The hand-to-hand BIA model estimating equation for female participants was FFM = 0.615 h²/Z - 0.144 year + 0.132 weight + 16.507 (² = 0.870, SEE = 1.884 kg, = 201); the three mean validated correlation coefficient and LOA for the hand-to-foot BIA model measurements for female participants (FFM and FFM) were 0.929 and -3.880-3.886 kg, respectively. The FFM and FFM were 0.942 and -3.511-3.489 kg, respectively. The results of both hand-to-hand and hand-to-foot BIA models demonstrated similar reliability, and the hand-to-hand BIA models are practical for assessing FFM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5084040PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8100654DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ffm ffm
24
bia model
20
ffm
16
hand-to-foot bia
16
hand-to-hand bia
12
bia
9
hand-to-hand model
8
model bioelectrical
8
bioelectrical impedance
8
impedance analysis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!