When is a theory a theory? A case example.

Eval Program Plann

UCLA, United States. Electronic address:

Published: August 2017

This discussion comments on the approximately 20years history of writings on the prescriptive theory called Empowerment Evaluation. To do so, involves examining how "Empowerment Evaluation Theory" has been defined at various points of time (particularly 1996 and now in 2015). Defining a theory is different from judging the success of a theory. This latter topic has been addressed elsewhere by Michael Scriven, Michael Patton, and Brad Cousins. I am initially guided by the work of Robin Miller (2010) who has written on the issue of how to judge the success of a theory. In doing so, she provided potential standards for judging the adequacy of theories. My task is not judging the adequacy or success of the Empowerment Evaluation prescriptive theory in practice, but determining how well the theory is delineated. That is, to what extent do the writings qualify as a prescriptive theory.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prescriptive theory
12
theory
8
empowerment evaluation
8
success theory
8
judging adequacy
8
theory theory?
4
theory? case
4
case example
4
example discussion
4
discussion comments
4

Similar Publications

We present a modeling strategy to forecast the incidence rate of dengue in the department of Córdoba, Colombia, thereby considering the effect of climate variables. A Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average model with exogenous variables (SARIMAX) model is fitted under a cross-validation approach, and we examine the effect of the exogenous variables on the performance of the model. This study uses data of dengue cases, precipitation, and relative humidity reported from years 2007 to 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dimensions of nursing-midwifery care during the COVID-19 pandemic in light of Jean Watson.

Rev Esc Enferm USP

December 2024

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Departamento de Enfermagem Materno-Infantil, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Objective: To understand the theoretical dimensions of nursing-midwifery care for women in labor during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method: A qualitative study with 40 nurse-midwives. Data were collected from May to July 2021, through interviews, subjected to thematic content analysis and discussed in light of Jean Watson's Theory of Transpersonal Human Caring.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Disparities of power between high-income (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have long characterised the structures of global health, including knowledge production and training. Historical case study analysis is an often-overlooked tool to improve our understanding of how to mitigate inequalities.

Methods: Drawing from the contemporary experience of collaborators from Canada and Ethiopia, we chose to examine the historical relationship between Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie and Canadian Jesuit Lucien Matte as a case study for international collaborations based on the model of an 'invited guest'.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Exceptions, Paradoxes, and Their Resolutions in Chemical Reactivity.

J Org Chem

November 2024

Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz 1, 45470, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.

Progress in chemistry has primarily been framed through inductive processes, leading to the frequent emergence of exceptions and unexpected reactivities. These anomalies─ranging from surprising reactivity trends and paradoxical understandings to unanticipated parameter influences and unexpected successes or failures in synthetic methods─offer valuable insights that can drive scientific discovery. While it is commonly accepted that such exceptions can drive progress, many have been passively accepted without being explored for opportunities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Social dilemmas present a significant challenge in multi-agent cooperation because individuals are incentivised to behave in ways that undermine socially optimal outcomes. Consequently, self-interested agents often avoid collective behaviour. In response, we formalise social dilemmas and introduce a novel metric, the , to quantify the disparity between individual and group rationality in such scenarios.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!