Ten Ways to Provide a High-Quality Acoustical Environment in Schools.

Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch

Siebein Associates, Inc., Gainesville, FL.

Published: October 2000

AI Article Synopsis

  • The article discusses using impulse response measures to assess classroom acoustics in Florida, comparing "healthy" and poor sound environments.
  • The research involved recording acoustical measurements in 56 classrooms and modeling them to analyze how different materials and noise levels affect speech perception.
  • It offers 10 key recommendations for improving school acoustics, focusing on design and planning to enhance speech intelligibility and reduce background noise interference.

Article Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe the use of impulse response measures and observations in Florida classrooms. As a result of measures and observations in "healthy" and poor acoustical environments, 10 practical recommendations are proposed for improving the acoustical environment in schools. The primary research for these recommendations consisted of recording acoustical measurements of reverberation time and background noise, as well as newer acoustical measurements based on impulse response techniques, in 56 actual classrooms. Observations of classroom situations occurred in a subset of these schools. Computer and physical models of eight classrooms were constructed and tested with varying room finish materials and background noise levels to study the comeverberation bined effects of these architectural items on speech perception in the model rooms. The primary recommendations all relate to school design and planning. These include air-conditioning system selection and noise control techniques to minimize interference with listening, interior classroom acoustical design principles for maximizing speech perception, and the documentation of teaching methods and classroom arrangements that result in improving speech intelligibility and other factors affecting speech perception.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.3104.376DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

speech perception
12
acoustical environment
8
environment schools
8
impulse response
8
measures observations
8
primary recommendations
8
acoustical measurements
8
background noise
8
acoustical
6
ten ways
4

Similar Publications

Background: Cochlear implants (CI) with off-the-ear (OTE) and behind-the-ear (BTE) speech processors differ in user experience and audiological performance, impacting speech perception, comfort, and satisfaction.

Objectives: This systematic review explores audiological outcomes (speech perception in quiet and noise) and non-audiological factors (device handling, comfort, cosmetics, overall satisfaction) of OTE and BTE speech processors in CI recipients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA-S guidelines, examining Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: An improvement in speech perception is a major well-documented benefit of cochlear implantation (CI), which is commonly discussed with CI candidates to set expectations. However, a large variability exists in speech perception outcomes. We evaluated the accuracy of clinical predictions of post-CI speech perception scores.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Listeners with hearing loss have trouble following a conversation in multitalker environments. While modern hearing aids can generally amplify speech, these devices are unable to tune into a target speaker without first knowing to which speaker a user aims to attend. Brain-controlled hearing aids have been proposed using auditory attention decoding (AAD) methods, but current methods use the same model to compare the speech stimulus and neural response, regardless of the dynamic overlap between talkers which is known to influence neural encoding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interventions That Failed: Factors Associated with the Continuation of Bullying After a Targeted Intervention.

Int J Bullying Prev

April 2023

INVEST Flagship Research Center/Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.

We examined how often teachers' targeted interventions fail in stopping bullying and to what extent this varies between schools vs. between students involved. In addition, we investigated which student-level factors were associated with intervention failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!