AI Article Synopsis

  • Phase III trials revealed that the S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) treatment is less effective than the capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (COX) regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer.
  • A cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model indicated the expected costs for SOX and COX are 1,538,330 yen and 1,429,596 yen, respectively, with survival rates of 29.18 months for SOX and 28.63 months for COX.
  • Despite the SOX regimen being less effective, it was found to be more cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 197,698 yen per month.

Article Abstract

Phase III clinical trials have comfirmed that the S-1 plus oxaliplatin(SOX)is inferior to the capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (COX)regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.On the basis of these findings, we compared, using a clinical decision analysis-based approach, the cost-effectiveness of the SOX and COX regimens.Herein, we simulated the expected effects and costs of the SOX and COX regimens using the markov model.Clinical data were obtained from Hong's 2012 report.The cost data comprised the costs for pharmacist labor, material, inspection, and treatment for adverse event, as well as the total cost of care at the advanced stage.The result showed that the expected cost of the SOX and COX regimen was 1,538,330 yen, and 1,429,596 yen, respectively, with an expected survival rate of 29.18 months, and 28.63 months, respectively.The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the SOX regimen was 197,698 yen/month; thus, the SOX regimen was found to be more cost-effective that the COX regimen.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sox cox
16
cost-effectiveness sox
8
cox regimens
8
clinical decision
8
cox regimen
8
sox regimen
8
sox
6
cox
5
[comparison cost-effectiveness
4
regimens patients
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!