Two experiments investigated the development of metacognitive monitoring and control, and conditions under which children engage these processes. In Experiment 1, 5-year-olds (N = 30) and 7-year-olds (N = 30), unlike adults (N = 30), showed little evidence of either monitoring or control. In Experiment 2, 5-year-olds (N = 90) were given performance feedback (aimed at improving monitoring), instruction to follow a particular strategy (aimed at improving control), or both. Across conditions, feedback improved children's monitoring, and instruction improved both monitoring and control. Thus, children's poor metacognitive performance likely reflects a difficulty engaging the component processes spontaneously rather than a lack of metacognitive ability. These findings also suggest that the component processes are distinct, with both undergoing protracted development.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397377PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12644DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

component processes
12
monitoring control
12
protracted development
8
control conditions
8
experiment 5-year-olds
8
aimed improving
8
monitoring instruction
8
monitoring
5
carving metacognition
4
metacognition joints
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!