Our study had two major objectives: (1) to clarify the roles of buried seed and different types of localized disturbance in activating outbreaks of a pasture weed (tansy ragwort, Senecio jacobaea), and (2) to measure the effectiveness of two natural enemies (the cinnabar moth Tyria jacobaeae and a ragwort flea beetle, Longitarsus jacobaeae) in inhibiting weed population increase and spread. We conducted a 5-yr field experiment on the coast of Oregon using a randomized-block design with four blocks x three levels of disturbance (background vegetation was Tilled, Clipped, Unaltered) x two levels of cinnabar moth (Exposed, Protected) x two levels of flea beetle (Exposed, Protected) = 48 plots (each plot was 0.25 m^2). Disturbance consistently increased ragwort abundance (measured as density of juveniles, adults, and their offspring; cover; and biomass); the effect was generally greater in Tilled compared to Clipped disturbance treatments. We also found striking differences in the contribution of each natural enemy to ragwort control. The flea beetle quickly reduced ragwort survival, and this led to a strong and rapid reduction in ragwort abundance. The cinnabar moth reduced ragwort fecundity, but this did not translate into reductions in ragwort cover (measured in 1986 and 1987) or biomass (measured annually from 1986 through 1990). These results establish that (1) ragwort populations were limited more by availability of microsites for germination and establishment than by availability of seed, (2) the ragwort flea beetle was the key factor regulating ragwort abundance, and (3) reduction in ragwort fecundity by the cinnabar moth had little effect on the dynamics of ragwort populations on local scales of space and time. These findings underscore the value of field experiments for investigating the dynamics of biological control systems, the manner in which they are regulated, and their response to perturbation. They further establish how colonization and invasion by ragwort depend on attributes of the disturbance and of natural enemy regimes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1942100 | DOI Listing |
Curr Biol
December 2021
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
The conspicuous warning signal of aposematic animals is learned by their predators, and the resulting avoidance benefits both parties. Given evidence that birds can distinguish the profitability of prey from the environmental context in which they appear, aposematic insects' host plants might also provide an important cue to foraging predators. The aposematic cinnabar moth (Tyria jacobaeae) larva is a specialist on its ragwort (Senecio spp.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Biol
August 2021
Laboratory for Fundamental and Applied Research in Chemical Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Neuchâtel, Rue Emile-Argand 11, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
It is increasingly evident that plants interact with their outside world through the production of volatile organic compounds, but whether the volatiles have evolved to serve in plant defense is still a topic of considerable debate. Unharmed leaves constitutively release small amounts of volatiles, but when the leaves are damaged by herbivorous arthropods, they emit substantially more volatiles. These herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) attract parasitoids and predators that kill insect herbivores, and this can benefit the plants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFR Soc Open Sci
February 2018
School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK.
Defended prey often use distinctive, conspicuous, colours to advertise their unprofitability to potential predators (aposematism). These warning signals are frequently made up of salient, high contrast, stripes which have been hypothesized to increase the speed and accuracy of predator avoidance learning. Limitations in predator visual acuity, however, mean that these patterns cannot be resolved when viewed from a distance, and adjacent patches of colour will blend together (pattern blending).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Chem Ecol
February 2015
Plant Ecology and Phytochemistry, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Sylviusweg 72, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands,
J Chem Ecol
March 2013
School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Lumo Road 388, 430074, Wuhan, China.
Plants produce a variety of secondary metabolites (PSMs) that may be selective against herbivores. Yet, specialist herbivores may use PSMs as cues for host recognition, oviposition, and feeding stimulation, or for their own defense against parasites and predators. This summarizes a dual role of PSMs: deter generalists but attract specialists.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!