Severe graft-versus-host disease is a major barrier for non-T-cell-depleted haploidentical stem cell transplantation. There is no consensus on the optimal graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. This study compared the two most commonly used graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis regimens (post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based vs. the anti-thymocyte globulin-based) in adults with acute myeloid leukemia reported to the European Society for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation. A total of 308 patients were analyzed; 193 received post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen and 115 anti-thymocyte globulin-based regimen as anti-graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. The post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen was more likely to be associated to bone marrow as graft source (60% vs. 40%; P=0.01). Patients in the post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen group had significantly less grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease than those in the anti-thymocyte globulin-based group (5% vs. 12%, respectively; P=0.01), comparable to chronic graft-versus-host disease. Multivariate analysis showed that non-relapse mortality was lower in the post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen group [22% vs. 30%, Hazard ratio (HR) 1.77(95%CI: 1.09-2.86); P=0.02] with no difference in relapse incidence. Patients receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen had better graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival [HR 1.45 (95%CI: 1.04-2.02); P=0.03] and leukemia-free survival [HR 1.48 (95%CI: 1.03-2.12); P=0.03] than those in the anti-thymocyte globulin-based group. In the multivariate analysis, there was also a trend for a higher overall survival [HR 1.43 (95%CI: 0.98-2.09); P=0.06] for post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen versus the anti-thymocyte globulin-based group. Notably, center experience was also associated with non-relapse mortality and graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival. Haplo-SCT using a post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen can achieve better leukemia-free survival and graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival, lower incidence of graft-versus-host disease and non-relapse mortality as compared to anti-thymocyte globulin-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286948PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.151779DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based
32
graft-versus-host disease
28
cyclophosphamide-based regimen
28
anti-thymocyte globulin-based
24
disease prophylaxis
20
globulin-based group
12
non-relapse mortality
12
graft-versus-host disease-free
12
disease-free relapse-free
12
relapse-free survival
12

Similar Publications

Background: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is a commonly used graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, particularly in the setting of haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The rate of graft failure has been reported to be as high as 12-20% in haplo-HCT recipients using PTCy. The objective of this study was to determine if donor type influenced the risk of late graft failure following RIC HCT using PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The rate of immune reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) plays the principal role in the development of serious post-transplant complications. However, the post-transplantation course has a significant impact on shaping the immune system of the recipient, per se, thus representing risk factors for subsequent unfavorable outcomes. The predictive power of an interferon gamma (IFNγ) release assay (IGRA) on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or hematological relapse in recipients of allo-HSCT treated with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and the impact of these complications on the restoration of cellular immune responsiveness was evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Disparities in Allograft Access in the Era of Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Mismatched Unrelated Donor Transplantation.

J Clin Oncol

November 2024

Warren B. Fingrut, MD, MPH, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andromachi Scaradavou, MD, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies, MSK Kids, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Juliet N. Barker, MBBS, Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reply to: Disparities in Allograft Access in the Era of Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Mismatched Unrelated Donor Transplantation.

J Clin Oncol

November 2024

Brian C. Shaffer, MD, MS, Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Mahasweta Gooptu, MD, Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brookline, MA; Todd DeFor, MS, Stephen R. Spellman, MBS, and Heather E. Stefanski, MD, PhD, CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, MN; Bronwen E. Shaw, MD, PhD, CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Jeffery J. Auletta, MD, and Steven M. Devine, MD, CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, MN; Antonio M. Jimenez, MD, MSc, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, and Monzr M. Al Malki, MD, Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients who receive solid organ transplants often require lifelong immunosuppression, which increases their risk for hematologic disorders. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers a potential curative treatment option for these patients. However, there is still a lack of understanding and guidance on graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) immunosuppression regimens, potential complications, and outcomes in patients with solid organ transplants who undergo HSCT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!