Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: A principal goal for the use of positron emission tomography (PET) in oncology is for real-time evaluation of tumor response to chemotherapy. Given that many contemporary anti-neoplastic agents function by impairing cellular proliferation, it is of interest to develop imaging modalities to monitor these pathways. Here we examined the effect of capecitabine on the uptake of thymidine analogs used with PET: 3'-deoxy-3'-[F]fluorothymidine (F-FLT), 1-(2'-deoxy-2'-[F]fluoro-β-D-arabinofuranosyl) thymidine (F-FMAU), and 1-(2'-deoxy-2'-[F]fluoro-β-D-arabinofuranosyl) uracil (F-FAU) in patients with advanced cancer.
Methods: Fifteen patients were imaged, five with each imaging agent. Patients had been previously diagnosed with breast, colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers and had not received therapy for at least 4 weeks prior to the first scan, and had not been treated with any prior fluoropyrimidines. Subjects were imaged within a week before the start of capecitabine and on the second day of treatment, after the third dose of capecitabine. Tracer uptake was quantified by mean standard uptake value (SUV) and using kinetic analysis.
Results: Patients imaged with F-FLT showed variable changes in retention and two patients exhibited an increase in SUV of 172.3 and 89.9 %, while the other patients had changes ranging from +19.4 to -25.4 %. The average change in F-FMAU retention was 0.2 % (range -24.4 to 23.1) and F-FAU was -10.2 % (range -40.3 to 19.2). Observed changes correlated strongly with SUV but not kinetic measurements.
Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that patients treated with capecitabine can produce a marked increase in F-FLT retention in some patients, which will require further study to determine if this flare is predictive of therapeutic response. F-FAU and F-FMAU showed little change, on average, after treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067904 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0092-2 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!