Objectives: Interpreting the postoperative electroencephalographic (EEG) driving response (DR) as an indicator of electrode placement within the thalamic nucleus in deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) for refractory epilepsy is controversial.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively investigated the relationship between postoperative EEG DR and the location of 11 electrodes in 6 patients who underwent ANT DBS for refractory epilepsy.

Results: Cerebral synchronizing EEG DR was observed in 10 electrodes. However, 9 of the 11 electrodes were located within the ANT. For the 2 electrodes that missed the ANT, DR was observed in 1 misplaced electrode facing the anterior surface of the ANT within the third ventricle. The other misplaced electrode without DR elicitation showed a DR after electrode repositioning.

Conclusions: The diagnostic significance of DR as indirect evidence of electrodes being within thalamic nuclei is limited. If DR is not elicited, it should be regarded as a misplacement. Even if DR is elicited, it may not be interpreted as a sound indicator of proper electrode placement within the thalamus. A sophisticated, postoperative imaging study is warranted in every case of ANT DBS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000449012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

relationship postoperative
8
postoperative eeg
8
eeg driving
8
driving response
8
deep brain
8
brain stimulation
8
anterior nucleus
8
nucleus thalamus
8
refractory epilepsy
8
electrode placement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!