Background: Intraforaminal disc herniations at the L5-S1 level are extremely surgically challenging lesions. Intracanal approaches frequently require partial or total facetectomy, which may lead to instability. Solely extraforaminal approaches may offer limited visualization of the more medial superiorly exiting and inferiorly exiting nerve roots; this approach is also more complicated at L5-S1 due to the often large L5 transverse process and the iliac wing.
Methods: Nine patients with intraforaminal L5-S1 disc herniations, foraminal stenosis, or synovial cysts underwent contralateral interlaminar approaches for lesion resection. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale scores were evaluated, and complications were reviewed.
Results: All 9 patients demonstrated immediate postoperative clinical improvement. None of the patients exhibited complications and none developed instability or neuropathic disorders.
Conclusions: Although the number of cases in our sample was very small (9 in total), the contralateral interlaminar approach appeared to effectively address multiple degenerative L5-S1 foraminal pathologies. Large studies are needed to further evaluate the pros and cons of this approach.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046797 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.191024 | DOI Listing |
Neurospine
December 2024
Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
This video aims to describe an endoscopic surgical approach for accessing difficult to reach pathology such as disc herniations after previous surgery. The relatively small size of endoscopic instruments facilitates significant freedom of movement inside the spinal canal. The authors have experience with interlaminar approaches for contralateral pathology such as disc herniations, recurrent disc herniations, spinal stenosis, and facet cysts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInterv Pain Med
September 2024
Jordan Young Institute, Virginia Beach, VA, USA.
This series of FactFinders presents a brief summary of the evidence and outlines recommendations to minimize risks associated with cervical epidural injections. Evidence in support of the following facts is presented. - 1) CILESIs should be performed at C6-C7 or below, with C7-T1 as the preferred access point due to the more generous dorsal epidural space at this level compared to the more cephalad interlaminar segments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Spine Surg
December 2024
Department of Orthopedics, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, P.R. China.
Study Design: Technical report.
Objective: This report aimed to describe a 3-step unilateral uniportal interlaminar circum-dural approach for entire spinal canal inspection and bilateral discectomy at L5/S1 level.
Summary Of Background Data: Treatment of lumbar disc herniation with bilateral symptoms at L5/S1 level is complicated in full endoscopic surgeries.
Neurosurg Rev
August 2024
Center for Spine Surgery and Pain Therapy, Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology of the St. Elisabeth Group, Marien Hospital Herne, Catholic Hospital Rhein-Ruhr, St. Anna Hospital Herne, University Hospital/Marien Hospital Witten, Herne, Germany.
Background: The L5-S1 interlaminar access described in 2006 by Ruetten et al. represented a paradigm shift and a new perspective on endoscopic spinal approaches. Since then, the spinal community has shown that both the traditional ipsilateral and novel contralateral interlaminar approaches to the L5-S1 foramen are good alternatives to transforaminal access.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Pract
November 2024
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background: Recent advancements in cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections have given rise to the modified paramedian interlaminar (mPIL) approach. The objective of this study was to perform an analysis of the contrast spread pattern within the cervical epidural space, taking into account different needle tip positions in the mPIL approach.
Methods: A total of 48 patients were included in the study and randomly assigned to either the medial or lateral group based on the needle tip's position in the anterior-posterior view.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!