Correlative evidence suggests that testosterone promotes dominance and aggression. However, causal evidence is scarce and offers mixed results. To investigate this relationship, we administered testosterone for 48h to 41 healthy young adult men in a within-subjects, double-blind placebo-controlled balanced crossover design. Subjects played the role of responders in an ultimatum game, where rejecting a low offer is costly, but serves to destroy the proposer's profit. Such action can hence be interpreted as non-physical aggression in response to social provocation. In addition, subjects completed a self-assessed mood questionnaire. As expected, self-reported aggressiveness was a key predictor of ultimatum game rejections. However, while testosterone affected subjective ratings of feeling energetic and interested, our evidence strongly suggests that testosterone had no effect on ultimatum game rejections or on aggressive mood. Our findings illustrate the importance of using causal interventions to assess correlative evidence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.09.012 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Beauty and Social Interest Matter: Effects of Male's Facial Attractiveness, Vocal Attractiveness and Social Interest on Female's Decisions in Three-Person Games.
Behav Sci (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Medical Humanities, School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.
Facial attractiveness, vocal attractiveness, and social interest influence two-person decision making. However, it remains unclear how these three factors jointly influence three-person bargaining. We investigated the impact of facial attractiveness, vocal attractiveness, and social interest on fairness decisions in a three-person ultimatum game and a third-party punishment dictator game.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCompeting fairness ideals underlie wealth inequality across decision contexts.
Sci Rep
December 2024
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wealth inequality is one of the most profound challenges confronting society today. However, an important issue in addressing inequality lies in formalizing the diversity of individual perspectives regarding what constitutes a fair distribution of resources. We tackle this topic by simulating wealth inequality through the allocation of bonus endowments in both Dictator Game (DG) and Ultimatum Game (UG) settings and capturing distributive decisions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSubstantial Heritability Underlies Fairness Norm Adaptation Capability and its Neural Basis.
Adv Sci (Weinh)
December 2024
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
The present research uncovers the shared genetic underpinnings of fairness norm adaptation capability, its neural correlates, and long-term mental health outcomes. One hundred and eighty-six twins are recruited and played as responders in the Ultimatum Game (UG) while undergoing fMRI scanning in their early adulthood (Study-1) and are measured on depressive symptoms eight years later (Study-2). With computational modeling, the process of norm adaptation is differentiated from that of fairness valuation in UG.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Cost of Looking Up: Social Comparison as a Partial Mediator Between Social Anxiety and Vindictive Behavior in a Non-anonymous Ultimatum Game.
Psychol Rep
December 2024
Department of Psychology, Social Work, and Educational Sciences, Ovidius University of Constanta, Constanta, Romania.
Self-appraisals in relation to internalized standards are fundamental constructs in clinical and evolutionary models of Social Anxiety (SA). Empirical evidence has consistently shown that socially anxious individuals tend to engage in upward social comparisons and aim to adjust their social standing accordingly. However, the consequences of perceiving oneself as inferior to others within social contexts remain under-explored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeural mechanisms of fairness decision-making: An EEG comparative study on opportunity equity and outcome equity.
Neuroimage
January 2025
Institute of Brain Science, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, China; Department of Psychology, Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, China; Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory for Research in Early Development and Childcare, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, China. Electronic address:
Social equity consists of opportunity equity and outcome equity, where outcome equity refers to the equitable distribution of resource, while opportunity equity refers to equivalent sets of opportunities to obtain a satisfactory outcome, ensuring equality in expected payoffs rather than the actual payoffs. Previous studies showed the existence of inequity aversion for opportunity inequality and identified some differences between opportunity equity and outcome equity in the behavior pattern of evaluation and reaction processes. However, the commonalities and distinctions in brain activity during the fairness decision-making of opportunity equity and outcome equity remain unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!