Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of, and compliance to, preservative-free (PF), fixed-combination (FC) bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in a clinical practice setting.
Patients And Methods: This open-label study observed patients switched to PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% due to insufficient intraocular pressure (IOP) control on previous therapies. IOP was measured at baseline and at ~12 weeks. Tolerability and continuation of therapy were also assessed.
Results: A total of 1,553 patients were included in the study, and the per-protocol population comprised 1,391 patients. There were some minor deviations from protocol: some patients with no prior therapy and some who switched for reasons other than insufficient IOP control were included in the analysis. The mean IOP was reduced by 27.4%, from 22.2 mmHg to 16.1 mmHg. In subgroup analyses, the mean IOP was significantly reduced from baseline, irrespective of whether previous treatment was monotherapy or combination therapy, and preserved or PF therapy. Physicians mostly (88.1%) reported the IOP-lowering efficacy of PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% to be as expected or better than expected. Switching to PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% resulted in reductions from baseline in the number of patients reporting ocular symptoms. Adverse events were reported by 6.2% of patients, the most common being eye irritation (1.6%) and eye pruritus (1.0%). Physicians reported treatment compliance as better or unchanged compared with prior treatment in almost all patients (93.9%). Most patients were expected to continue PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% after the end of the study.
Conclusion: Switching to PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% was associated with significant IOP reductions from baseline over 12 weeks. Adverse events were uncommon, and compliance was high compared with previous therapy. PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% may be a suitable treatment for patients with inadequately controlled IOP or who are sensitive to preservatives.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5036566 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S106159 | DOI Listing |
Clin Ophthalmol
April 2014
Medical Affairs, Allergan Holdings Ltd, Marlow, UK.
Objective: To compare a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (BTFC) with latanoprost monotherapy (LM) in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and risk factors for glaucomatous progression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Eye Res
January 2013
University of Colorado Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Purpose: To determine and compare the short-term, in vitro effect of prostaglandin analogues (PGAs), timolol, and benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on pre-adipocyte proliferation and adipocyte cytotoxicity.
Methods: For the proliferation assay, human primary subcutaneous pre-adipocytes were incubated in the presence of either bimatoprost (0.015%, 0.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther
August 2008
Glaucoma Consultants & Center for Eye Research, Mount Pleasant, SC, USA.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) efficacy and safety of dorzolamide/timolol in fixed combination (DTFC) versus bimatoprost in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients poorly controlled (> or =21 mmHg) on latanoprost.
Methods: This was a prospective, double-masked, randomized, controlled, cross-over evaluation. After a 6-week wash-out period, the patients then returned for baseline diurnal curve testing every 2 h (8 AM to 8 PM).
J Glaucoma
May 2008
University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817-2307, USA.
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fixed combination (FC) of bimatoprost (BIM) and timolol (TIM) compared with each of the active components for 3 months.
Patients And Methods: Two double-masked, randomized, multicenter parallel studies of FC (once-daily, mornings), BIM (once-daily, evenings), or TIM (twice-daily) were conducted in 1061 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Results: Mean diurnal decreases from baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) at month 3 were 8.
Surv Ophthalmol
March 2004
Keystone Research, Austin, Texas, USA.
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily (QD) bimatoprost, latanoprost, and timolol gel-forming solution in providing 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) control.
Design: This was a randomized, multicenter, investigator-masked, prospective, parallel-group, clinical trial.
Participants: Patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!