Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Age-related changes in lens elasticity and ciliary muscle contractility can affect how ocular parameters respond to cycloplegia, and therefore intraocular lens (IOL) power measurements calculated by formulas using anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), or white-to-white (WtW) for effective lens position prediction can vary. In response, using swept-source optical biometry in prepresbyopic and presbyopic eyes, we investigated changes in ocular parameters and IOL power calculations attributable to cycloplegia.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Methods: In 38 prepresbyopic and 42 presbyopic eyes, we measured pupil diameter, radius of corneal curvature values, central corneal thickness, WtW, ACD, LT, and axial length both before and after cycloplegia. We determined IOL power calculations with the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/theoretical, Holladay 2, and Haigis formulas. To pinpoint the effect of cycloplegia, we recorded refractive predictions in pre- and postdilation conditions according to the same IOL power calculations, even if postdilation IOL power calculations had changed.
Results: With cycloplegia, pupil diameter changed significantly more in presbyopic eyes (P < .001). Central corneal thickness decreased in prepresbyopic eyes (P = .048), whereas WtW increased in presbyopic eyes (P = .02). In both groups, ACD and LT changed significantly (P < .001). IOL power calculations according to the Holladay 2 formula differed in prepresbyopic eyes (P = .042), and refractive predictions with the Holladay 2 and Haigis formulas differed significantly in prepresbyopic eyes (P = .043 and P = .022, respectively).
Conclusion: Surgeons should consider the effect of cycloplegia on refractive prediction errors and IOL power calculations determined with Haigis and Holladay 2 formulas, especially in prepresbyopic ages.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.032 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!