AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed the effectiveness of the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) procedure over 24 months in men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
  • A total of 53 patients participated, initially receiving a sham procedure, then underwent PUL, with significant improvements in urinary symptoms, quality of life, and flow rate reported after 24 months.
  • Results indicated low adverse effects, with preserved sexual function and only a small percentage requiring further interventions.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the 24-month effectiveness of the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) procedure in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) assessed through a crossover study.

Patients And Methods: In all, 53 patients underwent a sham procedure as part of the blinded, randomised L.I.F.T. (Luminal Improvement Following prostatic Tissue approximation for the treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH) study at 19 centres and elected to enrol in this crossover study. The crossover procedure involved placement of permanent implants (UroLift system) into the prostatic lateral lobes. Patients were followed for 3 months after the sham procedure and then for 24 months after crossover to PUL, with assessments of urinary symptom relief, quality of life (QoL), urinary flow rate, sexual function, and adverse events.

Results: At 24 months after crossover to PUL, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), QoL, BPH Impact Index, and maximum urinary flow rate improved 36%, 40%, 54%, and 77% from baseline, respectively. Each IPSS parameter on average improved significantly from baseline (P < 0.005) and remained stable throughout follow-up. Symptom response after the sham procedure indicated initial improvement at 1 month with significant decay by 3 months. Adverse events were typically mild to moderate and patients returned rapidly to normal activity. Four patients (8%) required intervention with transurethral resection of the prostate and one patient required additional PUL implants within the 24-month period. There were no reported instances of de novo sustained erectile or ejaculatory dysfunction.

Conclusions: The PUL procedure is associated with rapid symptom relief, increased urinary flow rate and QoL improvement that remain stable over 24 months. Morbidity is low and sexual function is preserved.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.13666DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostatic urethral
8
urethral lift
8
luts secondary
8
sham procedure
8
24 months crossover
8
crossover pul
8
urinary flow
8
flow rate
8
crossover
6
prostatic
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!