Objective: This study evaluated the possible pharmacokinetic interactions between rosuvastatin and fimasartan, an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker (ARB), approved in Korea for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Methods: In this open-label, multiple-dose, two-period, single-sequence study, the enrolled subjects were randomized into two separate parts (A and B). In part A, subjects received 120 mg of fimasartan alone for 7 days during period I, and 120 mg fimasartan with 20 mg rosuvastatin for 7 days during period II. In Part B, subjects received rosuvastatin alone, followed by concomitant administration of fimasartan, with the same doses used as in Part A. There was a 7-day washout between periods I and II. Serial blood samples were collected for up to 48 hours for fimasartan and for up to 72 hours for rosuvastatin after the last dose of each period to determine the steady-state pharmacokinetics of both drugs.

Results: The mean C and AUC values of fimasartan were 258.03 ± 176.75 ng/mL and 746.52 ± 273.49 ng×h/mL for fimasartan alone, and 289.40 ± 231.44 ng/mL and 848.43 ± 267.45 ng×h/mL for fimasartan and rosuvastatin coadministration, respectively (p-values for C and AUC, 0. 513 and 0.006, respectively). The mean C and AUC values of rosuvastatin were 9.94 ± 4.48 ng/mL and 85.29 ± 36.25 ng×h/mL for rosuvastatin alone and 11.94 ± 8.47 ng/mL and 77.33 ± 38.71 ng×h/mL for fimasartan and rosuvastatin coadministration, respectively (p-values for C and AUC, 0.066 and 0.009, respectively). The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the C and AUC of fimasartan (with/without rosuvastatin) were 1.109 (0.813 - 1.511) and 1.159 (1.061 - 1.265), respectively. The GMR and 90% CI for the C and AUC of rosuvastatin (with/without fimasartan) were 1.090 (0.979 - 1.213) and 0.870 (0.804 - 0.940), respectively.

Conclusions: These results suggest that fimasartan and rosuvastatin have no relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. All treatments were well tolerated during this study, with no serious adverse effects.
.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/CP202615DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fimasartan rosuvastatin
16
fimasartan
13
rosuvastatin
12
ng×h/ml fimasartan
12
subjects received
8
120 mg fimasartan
8
days period
8
auc values
8
rosuvastatin coadministration
8
coadministration p-values
8

Similar Publications

Hepatic impairment (HI) moderately (<5-fold) affects the systemic exposure (i.e., area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of drugs that are substrates of the hepatic sinusoidal organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) transporters and are excreted unchanged in the bile and/or urine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy involving fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who fail to respond to fimasartan monotherapy.

Methods: This phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted in adults aged 19-70 years. Patients who voluntarily consented were screened for eligibility to enroll in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The goal of this study was to evaluate the concurrent control rate of hypertension and dyslipidemia by fimasartan and rosuvastatin in patients who were concomitantly prescribed both drugs.

Methods: This single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted in 536 patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia who were taking fimasartan and rosuvastatin together for at least 12 weeks. Patients were enrolled from October 2016 to March 2018 at a tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: A new fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of 120 mg fimasartan and 20 mg rosuvastatin was developed to increase therapeutic convenience and improve treatment compliance.

Methods: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover study with a 7-day washout period was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and bioequivalence between an FDC of fimasartan/rosuvastatin and the separate co-administration of fimasartan and rosuvastatin in healthy Korean volunteers. The plasma concentrations of fimasartan and rosuvastatin were analyzed by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method, for which serial blood samples were collected for up to 48 hours post-administration of fimasartan and 72 hours post-administration of rosuvastatin, in each period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety profiles of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin with the co-administration of the two products by using a replicated crossover study design in healthy male subjects.

Results: This was an open-label, randomized, three-sequence, three-period replicated crossover study in healthy male subjects. The replicated crossover design was done because of high coefficient of variation of PK parameter for fimasartan, that is, >30%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!