Background: Musculoskeletal ultrasound is a non-invasive and low-cost modality for real-time visualisation of the plantar fascia. Ultrasound examination for plantar fasciitis is generally performed with the patient in a prone position, although the rational for using a prone position has not been validated. The aim of the study was to investigate if ultrasound examination in a supine position, which is more comfortable than the prone position, is valid.
Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 30 participants with plantar fasciitis, 8 men (27 %) and 22 women (73 %), with a mean age of 53.9 ± 12.6 (range, 32 to 77) years, and an equal distribution of left and right feet. The plantar heel was divided into three portions for ultrasound examination: medial, central and lateral. Two measurements of plantar fascia thickness were obtained for each portion, with participants in 2 positions (supine and prone) and for 2 ankle postures (neutral and 15° of plantarflexion). Mean measurements of plantar fascia thickness were compared between the two positions (Wilcoxon signed rank tests for non-normally distributed data and paired t-tests for normally distributed data). Participants were asked to report their preferred position for examination, supine or prone.
Results: The measured thickness was comparable for both supine and prone positions, for both ankle postures, neutral and 15° of plantarflexion (p > 0.05). A specific self-reported preferred position was not identified.
Conclusions: Ultrasound examination of plantar fasciitis can be performed in the supine position without any significant difference in measurement compared to examination in the conventional prone position.
Trial Registration: The Catholic Medical Center Office of Human Research Protection Program (CMC-OHRP)/Institutional Review Board approved the current study (Approval No. KC12DISI0338), and all participants provided their written informed consent for participation and publication.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025581 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0171-4 | DOI Listing |
J Med Ultrasound
November 2024
Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sam Ratulangi, Manado, Indonesia.
Background: Pregnancy is associated with distinct risks of fascia thickness compared to nulliparous. Therefore, this study aimed to compare plantar fascia thickness between asymptomatic pregnant women and nulliparous, evaluating the relationship with age, body mass index (BMI), arch height index (AHI), gestational age, and number of pregnancies.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between January and March 2023, and subjects were through a simple random sampling method.
Arthrosc Tech
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.
Plantar fasciitis (PF), a common cause of heel pain, primarily results from inflammation of the plantar fascia due to excessive strain. Its complex pathophysiology, influenced by various biomechanical factors, has led to the development of diverse surgical techniques. Most of these techniques, when used in isolation, have shown benefits in treating refractory PF.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Phys Med Rehabil
January 2025
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids (CS) in treating plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief, foot function, and plantar fascia thickness to identify the optimal treatment approach.
Design: A comprehensive search of medical databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, utilizing an extensive keyword strategy. Inclusion criteria encompassed prospective RCTs involving adult patients with plantar fasciitis treated with local PRP or CS injections, specifically assessing outcomes such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and plantar fascia thickness.
Front Neurol
December 2024
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital and Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling (DN) on pain and functional outcomes in patients with plantar fasciitis (PF).
Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, web of science, physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of dry needling on plantar fasciitis. Article screening, data extraction and risk-of-bias evaluation were independently performed by two reviewers.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
January 2025
Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to article "Heel Pain - Plantar Fasciitis: Revision 2023" by Koc et al. .
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!