Patch Testing for Evaluation of Hypersensitivity to Implanted Metal Devices: A Perspective From the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

Dermatitis

From the *Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston; †Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; ‡University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; §Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA; ∥Duke Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; ¶Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA; #Department of Dermatology, George Washington University, Washington, DC; **Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; ††Division of Dermatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Division of Dermatology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester; §§University of Illinois at Chicago; ∥∥Division of Dermatology, Departments of Medicine and Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; ¶¶Department of Dermatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; ##Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; ***Dermatology-Plastic Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; and †††Department of Medicine (Dermatology), University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Published: February 2018

The American Contact Dermatitis Society recognizes the interest in the evaluation and management of metal hypersensitivity reactions. Given the paucity of robust evidence with which to guide our practices, we provide reasonable evidence and expert opinion-based guidelines for clinicians with regard to metal hypersensitivity reaction testing and patient management. Routine preoperative evaluation in individuals with no history of adverse cutaneous reactions to metals or history of previous implant-related adverse events is not necessary. Patients with a clear self-reported history of metal reactions should be evaluated by patch testing before device implant. Patch testing is only 1 element in the assessment of causation in those with postimplantation morbidity. Metal exposure from the implanted device can cause sensitization, but a positive metal test does not prove symptom causality. The decision to replace an implanted device must include an assessment of all clinical factors and a thorough risk-benefit analysis by the treating physician(s) and patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000210DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patch testing
12
american contact
8
contact dermatitis
8
dermatitis society
8
metal hypersensitivity
8
implanted device
8
metal
6
testing evaluation
4
evaluation hypersensitivity
4
hypersensitivity implanted
4

Similar Publications

Background: In Amsterdam, a steep increase in positive reactions to propolis in the European baseline series was observed from 2.8% in 2020 to 16.4% in 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: There is a current fashion for the use of methacrylate-containing nail cosmetics that can induce allergic contact dermatitis. European Union (EU) legislation was introduced in 2021 that had the aim of preventing its development.

Objectives: To assess prevalence and exposures causing contact allergy to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) prior to and following implementation of the legislation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The European Photopatch Testing Baseline Series (EPTBS) was published in 2013. However, limited data exist regarding the real-world clinical application of the EPTBS.

Objectives: This study aims to describe the photopatch test experience with the EPTBS over 11 years at a tertiary hospital in Spain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Design and Fabrication of a Patch Antenna for 5G Wireless Communications from a Low-Permittivity LiAlSiO-Based Ceramic.

ACS Appl Mater Interfaces

December 2024

Guangxi Universities Key Laboratory of Non-ferrous Metal Oxide Electronic Functional Materials and Devices, College of Material Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China.

A microwave dielectric ceramic based on lithium aluminum silicate (LiAlSiO) with ultralow permittivity was synthesized using the traditional solid-state reaction technique, and its dielectric characteristics at microwave frequencies are presented. The nominal LiAlSiO ceramic exhibited a relative permittivity of 3.95.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patch testing reactions can be difficult to interpret in patients with skin of color (higher Fitzpatrick skin types [FSTs]) due to limited erythema or vesiculation. Missed reactions may lead to prolonged allergic contact dermatitis duration and prevent disease clearance in this population. To compare the frequency of borderline patch test reactions in patients with different FSTs (I, II, III, IV, V, VI).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!