AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the relationship between student satisfaction and student-tutor ratios in medical schools, concluding that higher admissions correlate with lower student satisfaction.
  • A survey conducted with 2037 medical students revealed that assessment environments yielded the highest satisfaction, while clinical learning environments scored the lowest, particularly impacted by student-tutor ratios.
  • The findings suggest that schools with more admissions may struggle to maintain satisfaction due to high student-tutor ratios affecting the quality of clinical learning experiences.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Experiences of clinical and nonclinical learning environments, as well as assessment and study environments influence student satisfaction with their medical schools. Student-tutor ratios may impact on their perception of clinical learning environments. The aim of this study was to analyze medical students' satisfaction and student-tutor ratios in relation to medical schools' number of admissions.

Materials And Methods: A questionnaire was created, regarding learning, assessment and study environments in eight medical schools. 2037 students participated in this cross-sectional study. Cronbach' alpha (internal consistency) was calculated and principal component analysis was conducted. Pearson correlations and multiple comparisons were analyzed.

Results: Assessment environments showed the highest satisfaction scores and clinical learning environments the lowest scores. The national student-tutor ratio in clinical rotations is 7.53; there are significant differences among schools. Institutions with higher number of admissions showed the lowest scores of overall student satisfaction (r = -0.756; p < 0.05), which decreased with progression in the medical course. High student-tutor ratios are strongly correlated with low levels of satisfaction regarding clinical learning environments (r = -0.826; p < 0.05).

Discussion: Clinical learning environments show the lowest satisfaction scores, which may expose the effect of high ratios in clinical rotations. Depending on the number of admissions, significant differences between medical schools were found. Quality of teaching-learning strategies and articulation with hospitals might also be important variables.

Conclusion: Medical schools with more admissions might be more susceptible to lower scores of student satisfaction. High student-tutor ratios in clinical rotations may reduce the quality of learning experiences and inhibit the acquisition of competences.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

student-tutor ratios
20
learning environments
20
student satisfaction
16
medical schools
16
clinical learning
16
clinical rotations
12
medical
8
medical schools'
8
learning
8
satisfaction
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study examines the relationship between student satisfaction and student-tutor ratios in medical schools, concluding that higher admissions correlate with lower student satisfaction.
  • A survey conducted with 2037 medical students revealed that assessment environments yielded the highest satisfaction, while clinical learning environments scored the lowest, particularly impacted by student-tutor ratios.
  • The findings suggest that schools with more admissions may struggle to maintain satisfaction due to high student-tutor ratios affecting the quality of clinical learning experiences.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Context: In discussions of the merits and limitations of problem-based learning (PBL) as an educational methodology, the cost of its delivery is often cited as a significant issue. Although there appears to be no shortage of opinion as to the perceived cost of PBL, we know of no institution that has accurately measured its cost, even in financial terms. Where factual information is lacking, opinion and misconception tend to proliferate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Skills labs provide a sheltered learning environment. As close supervision and individual feedback were proven to be important in ensuring effective skills training, we implemented a cross-year peer tutor system in our skills lab of internal medicine that allowed intense training sessions with small learning groups (3-4 students) taught by one student tutor.

Methods: The expectations, experiences and criticisms of peer tutors regarding the tutor system for undergraduate skills lab training were investigated in the context of a focus group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluation of an intelligent tutoring system in pathology: effects of external representation on performance gains, metacognition, and acceptance.

J Am Med Inform Assoc

April 2007

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Shadyside Cancer Pavilion, Room 307, 5230 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.

Objective: Determine effects of computer-based tutoring on diagnostic performance gains, meta-cognition, and acceptance using two different problem representations. Describe impact of tutoring on spectrum of diagnostic skills required for task performance. Identify key features of student-tutor interaction contributing to learning gains.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!