Background: The purpose of this study is to determine whether larger abdominopelvic abscess drains reduce the time required for abscess resolution or the probability of tube occlusion.

Methods: 144 consecutive patients who underwent abscess drainage at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively.

Results: Larger initial drain size did not reduce drainage time, drain occlusion, or drain exchanges (P > .05). Subgroup analysis did not find any type of collection that benefitted from larger drains. A multivariate model predicting drainage time showed that large collections (>200 mL) required 16 days longer drainage time than small collections (<50 mL). Collections with a fistula to bowel required 17 days longer drainage time than collections without a fistula. Initial drain size and the viscosity of the fluid in the collection had no significant effect on drainage time in the multivariate model.

Conclusions: 8 F drains are adequate for initial drainage of most serous and serosanguineous collections. 10 F drains are adequate for initial drainage of most purulent or bloody collections.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315689PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

drainage time
16
abdominopelvic abscess
8
drain size
8
drainage
5
time
5
drain
4
abscess drain
4
size drainage
4
time probability
4
probability occlusion
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!