A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

AO pelvic fracture classification: can an educational package improve orthopaedic registrar performance? | LitMetric

AO pelvic fracture classification: can an educational package improve orthopaedic registrar performance?

ANZ J Surg

Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Published: December 2016

Background: The unstable pelvic fracture has been described as the 'killing fracture' because of the risk of significant vascular compromise. The ability to correctly classify pelvic fractures may therefore be crucial in optimizing patient outcomes. Pelvic fracture classification is difficult and previous research has indicated that ability is suboptimal in orthopaedic registrars. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of an educational package in improving orthopaedic registrars' ability to classify pelvic fractures.

Methods: A total of 35 orthopaedic registrars were recruited in this classification study. An educational package was used to introduce the AO classification of pelvic fractures and teach the registrars how to classify pelvic fractures using pelvic X-rays and computed tomography scans. A classification test assessed their classification ability before and after using the educational package. A third test was performed 2 weeks after the second to assess the stability of learning.

Results: The mean score at baseline of 8.4 ± 0.46 increased to 10.5 ± 0.48 after using the educational package, and this was maintained in the follow-up test (10.7 ± 0.54 (F(2,52) = 15.5, P < 0.001)). The proportion of registrars achieving a satisfactory score increased from 46% (16/35) to 77% (23/30) after training, and 90% (19/21) at follow-up (χ (2) = 6.74, P = 0.035).

Conclusion: The reliability with which orthopaedic registrars classified pelvic fractures was improved using an educational package. An educational package on pelvic fracture classification may prove to be a valuable addition to the orthopaedic training programme.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.13761DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

educational package
28
pelvic fracture
16
pelvic fractures
16
fracture classification
12
classify pelvic
12
orthopaedic registrars
12
pelvic
10
classification
7
educational
7
package
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!