Systematic Quality Assessment of Published Antishivering Protocols.

Anesth Analg

From the Departments of *Neurology, †Neurosurgery, ‡Pharmacy, and §Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Published: May 2017

Shivering is a common side effect of targeted temperature modulation and general anesthesia. Antishivering strategies often employ a stepwise approach involving both pharmacological and physical interventions. However, approaches to treat shivering are often empiric and vary widely across care environments. We evaluated the quality of published antishivering protocols and guidelines with respect to methodological rigor, reliability, and consistency of recommendations.Using 4 medical databases, we identified 4027 publications that addressed shivering therapy, and excluded 3354 due to lack of relevance. After applying predefined eligibility criteria with respect to minimal protocol standards, 18 protocols/guidelines remained. Each was assessed using a modified Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (mAGREE II) instrument containing 23 quality items within 6 domains (maximal score 23). Among 18 protocols/guidelines, only 3 incorporated systematically reviewed recommendations, whereas 15 merely targeted practice standardization. Fifteen of 18 protocols/guidelines addressed shivering during therapeutic cooling in which skin counterwarming and meperidine were most commonly cited. However, their mAGREE II scores were within the lowest tertile (1 to 7 points) and the median for all 18 protocols was 5. The quality domains most commonly absent were stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, and editorial independence. Three of 18 protocols/guidelines addressed postanesthetic antishivering. Of these, the American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines recommending forced-air warming and meperidine received the highest mAGREE II score (14 points), whereas the remaining 2 recommendations had low scores (<5 points).Current published antishivering protocols/guidelines lack methodological rigor, reliability, and strength, and even the highest scoring of the 18 protocols/guidelines fulfilled only 60% of quality items. To be consistent with evidence-based protocol/guideline development processes, future antishivering treatment algorithms should increase methodological rigor and transparency.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001571DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

published antishivering
8
antishivering protocols
8
addressed shivering
8
protocols/guidelines addressed
8
systematic quality
4
quality assessment
4
assessment published
4
antishivering
4
shivering
4
protocols shivering
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Shivering is a common complication in the postoperative period. The incidence of shivering has been reported to range from 5% to 65% under general anaesthesia and as 33% during epidural anaesthesia. Shivering can increase perioperative risk in patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Systematic Quality Assessment of Published Antishivering Protocols.

Anesth Analg

May 2017

From the Departments of *Neurology, †Neurosurgery, ‡Pharmacy, and §Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Shivering is a common side effect of targeted temperature modulation and general anesthesia. Antishivering strategies often employ a stepwise approach involving both pharmacological and physical interventions. However, approaches to treat shivering are often empiric and vary widely across care environments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Efficacy of Nonpharmacological Antishivering Interventions: A Systematic Analysis.

Crit Care Med

August 2015

1Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Weill Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. 2Department of Neurosciences, Weill Cornell Medical College of Weill Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. 3Department of Pharmacy, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. 4Department of Nursing, Weill Cornell Medical College of Weill Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. 5Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Objective: We performed a systematic review of the published evidence regarding nonpharmacologic antishivering interventions in various clinical settings.

Data Sources: Studies through November 2014 were identified using predefined search terms in electronic databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE: Excerpta Medica (Ovid), and Web of Science.

Study Selection: All identified articles were critically analyzed by applying prespecified criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Shivering after anesthesia or in the critical care setting is frequent, can be prolonged, and has the potential for serious adverse events and worsening outcomes. Furthermore, there are conflicting published data and clinical protocols on how to best treat shivering. In this study, we aimed to critically analyze the published evidence of antishivering medications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!