Does surgical treatment within 4 hours after trauma have an influence on neurological remission in patients with acute spinal cord injury?

Ther Clin Risk Manag

Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord injury, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Published: September 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates whether early surgery (within 4 hours) is more beneficial than late surgery (4-24 hours) for patients with acute spinal cord injuries.
  • The analysis included 51 patients, revealing no significant difference in neurological improvement regardless of the timing of the surgery.
  • The findings suggest that while timely intervention is important, performing surgery within the first 24 hours can be equally effective, allowing for a broader window of optimal care.

Article Abstract

Background: The proper timing for surgery in patients with acute spinal cord injury is controversial. This study was conducted to detect if there is an advantage in early (within the first 4 hours after trauma) compared to late (between 4 and 24 hours after trauma) surgery on neurological outcome.

Methods: In this single institution prospective cohort study, data were analyzed from 51 spinal cord injured patients with an average age of 43.4 (±19.2) years. The influence of early (29 patients within the first 4 hours) as opposed to late (22 patients between 4 and 24 hours) decompression was evaluated by comparing data for neurological outcome. Patients of the study collectively suffered acute spinal fractures from C2 to L3 (cervical 39.2%, thoracic 29.4%, and lumbal 21.6%) or nonosseous lesions (9.8%). American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grades were assessed at time of admission and 6 months after trauma or longer depending on the time of release. Surgical treatment included early stabilization and decompression within 24 hours.

Results: No significant difference between improved neurological function, measured with the AIS, and an early or late surgery time can be seen (P=0.402). Furthermore, binary logistic regression shows no significant difference between sex or age, and AIS improvement as possible confounders.

Conclusion: In our study, all patients with spinal cord injury were treated with spine stabilization and decompression within the first 24 hours after trauma. Surgical decompression within the first 4 hours after trauma was not associated with improved neurological outcome compared to treatment between 4 and 24 hours. In a clinical context, this indicates that there is a time frame of at least 1 day in which optimal care is possible.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5012849PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S108856DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hours trauma
20
spinal cord
16
acute spinal
12
surgical treatment
8
hours
8
treatment hours
8
patients acute
8
cord injury
8
patients hours
8
neurological outcome
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Traumatic injuries are a significant public health concern globally, resulting in substantial mortality, hospitalisation and healthcare burden. Despite the establishment of specialised trauma centres, there remains considerable variability in trauma-care practices and outcomes, particularly in the initial phase of trauma resuscitation in the trauma bay. This stage is prone to preventable errors leading to adverse events (AEs) that can impact patient outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the cough peak flow (CPF) for successful extubation in postcraniotomy critically ill patients.

Design: This was a single-centre prospective diagnostic study.

Setting: The study was conducted in three intensive care units (ICUs) of a teaching hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate the pediatric Brain Injury Guidelines (pBIG) for identifying pediatric patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) who may not need further neuroimaging or hospitalization.
  • A total of 955 patients were analyzed, with findings showing that the majority had pBIG 2 or 3 injuries, and nearly 40% of those who had repeat imaging showed hemorrhage progression.
  • Those meeting pBIG 3 criteria were significantly more likely to need surgical intervention or face higher mortality rates, emphasizing the importance of the guidelines in determining treatment urgency.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: TBI is the 3rd greatest risk factor for developing AD, behind genetics and aging. TBI is associated with a 3-4 year earlier onset of cognitive impairment, and increased cortical thinning and amyloid plaques in people with AD. The underlying mechanisms of this relationship are not understood, and as a result there are no treatments that protect patients from accelerated AD after TBI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious societal concern and is considered a major risk factor for the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. Identifying shared pathological mediators that contribute to the progression of AD following TBI may allow therapeutic targeting to reduce the likelihood of developing AD following TBI. Cerebrovascular dysfunction is present in both AD and TBI, and thrombin has been implicated as a mediator of cerebrovascular dysfunction and inflammation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!