Objective: MR urography (MRU) can be an alternative to CT urography (CTU) for imaging of the kidneys, urinary bladder, and collecting systems. MRU can be a challenging examination to perform and interpret, which may result in technical and interpretive errors being made. This article highlights the pitfalls associated with MRU and discusses how to recognize and avoid them.

Conclusion: When performed properly, MRU may provide imaging quality generally comparable to that of CTU, and it enables comprehensive evaluation of the entire urinary tract.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16348DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mri evaluation
4
evaluation urothelial
4
urothelial tract
4
tract pitfalls
4
pitfalls solutions
4
solutions objective
4
objective urography
4
mru
4
urography mru
4
mru alternative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!