Influence of Device Choice on the Effect of Intra-Arterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands).

Stroke

From the Departments of Neurology (D.W.D., P.J.K., P.S.F., O.A.B.), Radiology (A.v.d.L.), and Public Health (H.F.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Departments of Radiology (C.B.M., K.M.T., P.S.F., O.A.B.) and Neurology (Y.B.R., L.A.v.d.B.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Departments of Neurology (R.J.v.O., D.B.) and Radiology (W.H.v.Z., O.A.B.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

Published: October 2016

Background And Purpose: Intra-arterial treatment by means of retrievable stents has been proven safe and effective. In MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands), the choice of the type of thrombectomy device was left to the discretion of the interventionist. The aim of this study was to explore the differences in functional outcome, neurological recovery, reperfusion, extent of infarction, and adverse events according to stent type and make.

Methods: The primary outcome was functional outcome at 90 days, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Neuroimaging outcomes included occlusion on computed tomographic angiography at 24 hours, infarct volume at 5 to 7 days, and modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scores. Safety outcomes included death within 90 days and any symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. We analyzed possible interactions between stent type and treatment with multiple regression models. Treatment effects were adjusted for patient age, stroke severity, and collateral score.

Results: Of the 500 patients included in the trial, 233 were allocated to intervention. Of these, 124 (53%) were first treated with Trevo (adjusted common odds ratio for shift on the mRS [acOR, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.92]), 31 (13%) with Solitaire (acOR, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-3.73), 40 (17%) with other retrievable stents or mechanical devices (acOR, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-3.93], and 38 (16%) could not be treated. There was no interaction between device and treatment effect on functional outcome and all other secondary and safety outcomes.

Conclusions: We found no evidence for a differential effect of thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke by type of stent.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.isrctn.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN10888758.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013929DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acute ischemic
16
ischemic stroke
16
treatment acute
12
functional outcome
12
95% confidence
12
confidence interval
12
intra-arterial treatment
8
clean multicenter
8
multicenter randomized
8
randomized clinical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!