Recombinant human relaxin versus placebo for cervical ripening: a double-blind randomised trial in pregnant women scheduled for induction of labour.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

At the time of study conduct, an employee of Corthera, Inc. (formerly BAS Medical), 1660 South Amphlett Blvd., San Mateo, CA, 94402, USA.

Published: September 2016

Background: Nonclinical studies indicate that the hormone relaxin is a good candidate for a safe cervical ripening agent that does not cause uterine contractions.

Methods: This Phase II study (conducted November 2, 2005-October 20, 2006) was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial testing 24-h intravenous infusion of serelaxin (recombinant human relaxin) or placebo for cervical ripening in 72 healthy, primiparous women. Eligible subjects had a singleton pregnancy ≥40 weeks, were planned for elective induction, had vertex presentation of the fetus, intact membranes and a Bishop score at screening ≤4. In Part A of the study, safety evaluation of three escalating doses of serelaxin (7.5, 25 or 75 μg/kg/day) or placebo was performed in 22 subjects admitted to the hospital 24 h prior to scheduled induction (n = 7, 4, 4, and 7 subjects, respectively). The highest safe dose from Part A and placebo were then tested in Part B for safety and cervical ripening (n = 25 subjects/arm). Planned randomisation ratio was of 4:2 (serelaxin:placebo) for each dose group in Part A and 1:1 for Part B. For analysis, subjects in Part B were pooled with those receiving the same dose in Part A and all subjects receiving placebo were pooled. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in Bishop score at 6, 12 and 24 h or end of study drug administration. Maternal safety evaluations included adverse events and vital signs through 4 weeks. Fetal assessments included serial heart rate monitoring and nonstress testing. Neonatal assessments included Apgar scores, NICU admissions, and adverse events through 4 weeks.

Results: Overall, 74 subjects were randomized and 72 were treated. There were no significant differences between the groups receiving the highest safe dose of serelaxin (75 μg/kg/day) and placebo in the primary or secondary efficacy endpoints. Changes from baseline in Bishop score at 24 h were 4.19 ± 1.9 and 3.26 ± 2.26 in the pooled placebo and serelaxin groups, respectively (p = 0.2507). Serelaxin was well tolerated and no anti-serelaxin antibodies were detected in either subjects or neonates.

Conclusion: Serelaxin infusion at the end of pregnancy was well tolerated but did not advance cervical ripening.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00259103 (15 November 2005).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011832PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1046-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical ripening
16
bishop score
12
recombinant human
8
human relaxin
8
placebo
8
placebo cervical
8
scheduled induction
8
serelaxin 75 μg/kg/day
8
75 μg/kg/day placebo
8
highest safe
8

Similar Publications

Preinduction cervical ripening in previous caesarean pregnancy is limited to intracervical Foley catheter. This study is aimed at finding the vaginal birth rates, improvement of Bishop score, and safety of osmotic dilator (Dilapan-S) among women with previous caesarean pregnancy. We conducted this single-group clinical study after the approval of the institute ethics committee, clinical trial registration, and obtaining informed consent.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mifepristone versus Foley balloon catheter for outpatient cervical ripening at term: A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

December 2024

Dep. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University of Lisbon, Portugal; CEAUL - Centro de Estatística e Aplicações, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Objective: To evaluate whether the success rate of oral mifepristone was not inferior to that of Foley balloon catheter for outpatient cervical ripening of term pregnancies, and whether there were differences in side effects for mothers and newborns.

Design: Open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

Setting: A tertiary care European university hospital in an urban setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Around one in three pregnant women undergoes induction of labour in the United Kingdom, usually preceded by in-hospital cervical ripening to soften and open the cervix.

Objectives: This study set out to determine whether cervical ripening at home is within an acceptable safety margin of cervical ripening in hospital, is effective, acceptable and cost-effective from both National Health Service and service user perspectives.

Design: The CHOICE study comprised a prospective multicentre observational cohort study using routinely collected data (CHOICE cohort), a process evaluation comprising a survey and nested case studies (qCHOICE) and a cost-effectiveness analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The timing of amniotomy after the Foley balloon catheter removal is crucial for successful labor induction. This study aimed to assess the effects of the Bishop score on the timing of amniotomy in patients undergoing labor induction after the Foley balloon catheter removal. This was a retrospective cohort study based on electronic medical records.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM) occurs in about 8% of term pregnancies with over 70% delivering spontaneously within 24 h. However, prolonged PROM increases the risk of chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis. While misoprostol and oxytocin are considered safe and effective methods of labor induction, most guidelines do not encourage balloon catheter (BC) use following PROM given concerns about increased risk of chorioamnionitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!