Effectiveness of Fluticasone Furoate-Vilanterol for COPD in Clinical Practice.

N Engl J Med

From the Centre for Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust (J.V., A.W.), Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (J.M.G.), and NIHR Clinical Research Network Greater Manchester (S.M.), Manchester; Global Respiratory Franchise (D.L.) and Respiratory Research and Development (S.C., J.C., L.F., H.S.), GlaxoSmithKline UK, Brentford; Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (N.D.B., J.N., J.M.G.), NorthWest EHealth (J.N., J.M.G.), and NHS Salford Clinical Commissioning Group (S.M.), Salford; and Global Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Safety Evaluation and Risk Management, GlaxoSmithKline UK, Uxbridge (C.H.) - all in the United Kingdom.

Published: September 2016

Background: Evidence for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) comes from closely monitored efficacy trials involving groups of patients who were selected on the basis of restricted entry criteria. There is a need for randomized trials to be conducted in conditions that are closer to usual clinical practice.

Methods: In a controlled effectiveness trial conducted in 75 general practices, we randomly assigned 2799 patients with COPD to a once-daily inhaled combination of fluticasone furoate at a dose of 100 μg and vilanterol at a dose of 25 μg (the fluticasone furoate-vilanterol group) or to usual care (the usual-care group). The primary outcome was the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations among patients who had had an exacerbation within 1 year before the trial. Secondary outcomes were the rates of primary care contact (contact with a general practitioner, nurse, or other health care professional) and secondary care contact (inpatient admission, outpatient visit with a specialist, or visit to the emergency department), modification of the initial trial treatment for COPD, and the rate of exacerbations among patients who had had an exacerbation within 3 years before the trial, as assessed in a time-to-event analysis.

Results: The rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was significantly lower, by 8.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 15.2), with fluticasone furoate-vilanterol therapy than with usual care (P=0.02). There was no significant difference in the annual rate of COPD-related contacts to primary or secondary care. There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of the first moderate or severe exacerbation and the first severe exacerbation in the time-to-event analyses. There were no excess serious adverse events of pneumonia in the fluticasone furoate-vilanterol group. The numbers of other serious adverse events were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions: In patients with COPD and a history of exacerbations, a once-daily treatment regimen of combined fluticasone furoate and vilanterol was associated with a lower rate of exacerbations than usual care, without a greater risk of serious adverse events. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; Salford Lung Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01551758 .).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1608033DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluticasone furoate-vilanterol
16
usual care
12
moderate severe
12
serious adverse
12
adverse events
12
patients copd
8
fluticasone furoate
8
furoate-vilanterol group
8
rate moderate
8
severe exacerbations
8

Similar Publications

Effectiveness of ICS/LABA and LAMA/LABA in COPD due to biomass.

ERJ Open Res

November 2024

Research Department of COPD and Tobacco Smoking, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico.

Background: COPD due to biomass exposure (COPD-B) is highly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, and there are no clinical trials designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments currently recommended for patients with COPD due to cigarette smoking (COPD-C). The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/V) 100/25 μg and umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) 62.5/25 μg on the rate of exacerbations, the time to first exacerbation, on dyspnoea, health-related quality of life (HRQL), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV) and inspiratory capacity (IC) during a period of 6 months in patients with COPD-B and COPD-C, at a third level referral centre in Mexico City.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/objectives: Effective airway delivery of a fixed-dose combination of triple-aerosolized inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) is likely to positively affect therapeutic responses predicted in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study aimed to conduct in vitro fluticasone furoate, vilanterol trifenatate, and umeclidinium bromide depositions in a Next Generation Impactor. The aerodynamic properties of these inhaled medications influence the spatial distribution and drug abundance, particularly in the smaller airways, to reverse or alleviate disease pathology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Although some factors associated with asthma symptom deterioration and risk of exacerbation have been identified, these are not yet fully characterised. We conducted a clinical modelling and simulation study to understand baseline factors affecting symptom control, reliever use and exacerbation risk in patients with moderate-severe asthma during follow-up on regularly dosed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy, or ICS/long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) combination therapy.

Methods: Individual patient data from randomised clinical trials (undertaken between 2001 and 2019) were used to model the time course of symptoms (n = 7593), patterns of reliever medication use (n = 3768) and time-to-first exacerbation (n = 6763), considering patient-specific and extrinsic factors, including treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study examined the effectiveness of fluticasone furoate and vilanterol (FF/VIL) compared to budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR) in asthma patients classified as step 3 or 4 according to treatment guidelines.
  • After 12 months, those on FF/VIL reported greater improvements in asthma control test (ACT) scores than those on BUD/FOR, who showed no significant change in their fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels.
  • Despite variations in ACT and FeNO results, neither treatment group showed meaningful changes in pulmonary function, blood eosinophil count, or acute asthma exacerbation rates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Limited data exist comparing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus adjunctive therapy vs ICS alone in pediatric asthma patients.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) vs FF in children and adolescents with asthma.

Methods: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study (NCT03248128) included participants aged 5 to 17 years with six months or more asthma history uncontrolled on ICS monotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!