AI Article Synopsis

  • The management of neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) is complicated by the limitations of current imaging methods and a lack of effective biomarkers, making disease assessment challenging.
  • A Delphi consensus meeting of 33 NEN experts highlighted that while morphological imaging is valuable, existing imaging techniques and biomarkers are inadequate for accurately measuring disease status and predicting treatment responses.
  • The panel emphasized the need for improved tools and proposed that combining advanced imaging with circulating multianalyte mRNA tests (like NETest) could enhance real-time monitoring of NEN progression and therapeutic outcomes.

Article Abstract

The complexity of the clinical management of neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) is exacerbated by limitations in imaging modalities and a paucity of clinically useful biomarkers. Limitations in currently available imaging modalities reflect difficulties in measuring an intrinsically indolent disease, resolution inadequacies and inter-/intra-facility device variability and that RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria are not optimal for NEN. Limitations of currently used biomarkers are that they are secretory biomarkers (chromogranin A, serotonin, neuron-specific enolase and pancreastatin); monoanalyte measurements; and lack sensitivity, specificity and predictive capacity. None of them meet the NIH metrics for clinical usage. A multinational, multidisciplinary Delphi consensus meeting of NEN experts (n = 33) assessed current imaging strategies and biomarkers in NEN management. Consensus (>75%) was achieved for 78% of the 142 questions. The panel concluded that morphological imaging has a diagnostic value. However, both imaging and current single-analyte biomarkers exhibit substantial limitations in measuring the disease status and predicting the therapeutic efficacy. RECIST remains suboptimal as a metric. A critical unmet need is the development of a clinico-biological tool to provide enhanced information regarding precise disease status and treatment response. The group considered that circulating RNA was better than current general NEN biomarkers and preliminary clinical data were considered promising. It was resolved that circulating multianalyte mRNA (NETest) had clinical utility in both diagnosis and monitoring disease status and therapeutic efficacy. Overall, it was concluded that a combination of tumor spatial and functional imaging with circulating transcripts (mRNA) would represent the future strategy for real-time monitoring of disease progress and therapeutic efficacy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045519PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-16-0043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disease status
12
therapeutic efficacy
12
imaging modalities
8
limitations currently
8
monitoring disease
8
imaging
7
biomarkers
7
disease
6
nen
5
delphic consensus
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!