Safety of Adding Salmeterol to Fluticasone Propionate in Children with Asthma.

N Engl J Med

From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.).

Published: September 2016

Background: Long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) have been shown to increase the risk of asthma-related death among adults and the risk of asthma-related hospitalization among children. It is unknown whether the concomitant use of inhaled glucocorticoids with LABAs mitigates those risks. This trial prospectively evaluated the safety of the LABA salmeterol, added to fluticasone propionate, in a fixed-dose combination in children.

Methods: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, children 4 to 11 years of age who required daily asthma medications and had a history of asthma exacerbations in the previous year to receive fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol or fluticasone alone for 26 weeks. The primary safety end point was the first serious asthma-related event (death, endotracheal intubation, or hospitalization), as assessed in a time-to-event analysis. The statistical design specified that noninferiority would be shown if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio for the primary safety end point was less than 2.675. The main efficacy end point was the first severe asthma exacerbation that led to treatment with systemic glucocorticoids, as assessed in a time-to-event analysis.

Results: Among the 6208 patients, 27 patients in the fluticasone-salmeterol group and 21 in the fluticasone-alone group had a serious asthma-related event (all were hospitalizations); the hazard ratio with fluticasone-salmeterol versus fluticasone alone was 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 2.27), which showed the noninferiority of fluticasone-salmeterol (P=0.006). A total of 265 patients (8.5%) in the fluticasone-salmeterol group and 309 (10.0%) in the fluticasone-alone group had a severe asthma exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.01).

Conclusions: In this trial involving children with asthma, salmeterol in a fixed-dose combination with fluticasone was associated with the risk of a serious asthma-related event that was similar to the risk with fluticasone alone. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; VESTRI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01462344 .).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606356DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

salmeterol fluticasone
12
fluticasone propionate
12
serious asthma-related
12
asthma-related event
12
hazard ratio
12
children asthma
8
risk asthma-related
8
fixed-dose combination
8
primary safety
8
safety point
8

Similar Publications

The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of breathing parameters, age, gender and disease status on the lung doses of the two ICS + LABA fixed combination dry powder drugs. Breathing parameters of 113 COPD patients were measured while inhaling through emptied NEXThaler® and Ellipta® inhalers and the corresponding lung doses were calculated. Lung dose of Foster® NEXThaler® was superior to the lung dose of Relvar® Ellipta® in around 85 % of the patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: UMEC/VI administered via a combination inhaler is associated with a clinically significant improvement in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. However, their efficacy compared to other bronchodilator mono or dual therapies still remains unclear.

Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of UMEC/VI dual and UMEC/VI/FF triple therapies versus alternative bronchodilator regimens in COPD patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!