AI Article Synopsis

  • - The MANTRA-PAF trial compared the effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) for treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), measuring outcomes over a 5-year follow-up.
  • - Results showed that a higher percentage of patients in the RFA group remained free of AF (86% vs 71%) and symptomatic AF (94% vs 85%) compared to those receiving AAD, with significant differences in AF burden as well.
  • - Quality of life scores improved for both groups from baseline, but there were no significant differences between the RFA and AAD groups at the 5-year mark.

Article Abstract

Objective: The Medical ANtiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (MANTRA-PAF) trial compared radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) as first-line treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Endpoint of ablation was elimination of electrical activity inside pulmonary veins. We present the results of the 5-year follow-up.

Methods: This pre-specified 5-year follow-up included assessment of any AF and symptomatic AF burden by one 7-day Holter recording and quality of life (QoL) assessment, using SF-36 questionnaire physical and mental component scores. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Imputation was used to compensate for missing Holter data.

Results: 245 of 294 patients (83%) randomised to RFA (n=125) or AAD (n=120) attended the 5-year follow-up, 227 with Holter recording. Use of class I or III AAD was more frequent in AAD group (N=61 vs 13, p<0.001). More patients in the RFA group were free from AF (126/146 (86%) vs 105/148 (71%), p=0.001, relative risk (RR) 0.82; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93) and symptomatic AF (137/146 (94%) vs 126/148 (85%), p=0.015, χ test, RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.98) in 7-day Holter recording. AF burden was significantly lower in the RFA group (any AF: p=0.003; symptomatic AF: p=0.02). QoL scores did not differ between randomisation groups. QoL scores remained improved from baseline (both components p<0.001), and did not differ from 2-year scores.

Conclusions: At 5 years, the occurrence and burden of any AF and symptomatic AF were significantly lower in the RFA group than in the AAD group. Improved QoL scores observed after 2 years persisted after 5 years without between-group differences.

Trial Registration Number: NCT00133211; Results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309781DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

paroxysmal atrial
12
atrial fibrillation
12
catheter ablation
8
5-year follow-up
8
holter recording
8
long-term efficacy
4
efficacy catheter
4
ablation
4
ablation first-line
4
first-line therapy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!