[Duration of Examination and Patient Comfort with a New Biometric Device, in Comparison to Three Established Devices].

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the duration of the preoperative examination and patient comfort in measurements with an Image Guided System (Verion, Alcon), which is used for the calculation and intraoperative alignment of toric intraocular lenses, in comparison to established keratometry devices.

Patients And Methods: In a prospective, monocentric, open, ethics committee controlled study, 150 eyes of 150 ophthalmologically healthy volunteers were examined by a single examiner. Three measurements were performed with the Verion Image Guided System and - for comparison - one measurement each with IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS900 and Pentacam HR. The measurement time was recorded with a stopwatch. For the analysis, patients were divided into three age groups (young, middle, old). Patient comfort was assessed using a questionnaire, which focussed on grading the whole measurement, as well as brightness of light, head posture and subjective duration.

Results: The mean age of the volunteers was 40.5 years (18-78 years). The mean duration of measurement was as follows: first Verion measurement 54.0 ± 42.7 seconds (n = 149), second Verion measurement 42.0 ± 20.5 s (n = 144), third Verion measurement 44.7 ± 25.2 s (n = 143), IOLMaster 500 46.3 ± 22.4 s (n = 147), Lenstar LS900 46.6 ± 14.4 s (n = 146) and Pentacam HR 46.6 ± 25.5 s (n = 147). Only the first and second Verion measurements were statistically different (p < 0.01). There were no statistical differences between the age groups, with the single exception of young versus old with the Pentacam (p < 0.01). Subjective patient comfort (n = 143) was very high for all devices and rated as "not uncomfortable" or "slightly uncomfortable".

Conclusion: The duration of the preoperative examination with the Verion Image Guided System is comparable to established keratometry devices. However, IOL calculation with the Verion requires measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth with another biometric device, which requires additional time. No age dependent differences were found. The examination can be easily integrated into clinical routine and is well tolerated by patients.