Purpose: To report a prospective, multicenter, observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01609621) of the safety and effectiveness of tibiopedal access and retrograde crossing in the treatment of infrainguinal chronic total occlusions (CTOs).

Methods: Twelve sites around the world prospectively enrolled 197 patients (mean age 71±11 years, range 41-93; 129 men) from May 2012 to July 2013 who met the inclusion criterion of at least one CTO for which a retrograde crossing procedure was planned or became necessary. The population consisted of 64 (32.5%) claudicants (Rutherford categories 2/3) and 133 (67.5%) patients with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category ≥4). A primary antegrade attempt to cross had been made prior to the tibiopedal attempt in 132 (67.0%) cases. Techniques used for access, retrograde lesion crossing, and treatment were at the operator's discretion. Follow-up data were obtained 30 days after the procedure.

Results: Technical tibiopedal access success was achieved in 184 (93.4%) of 197 patients and technical occlusion crossing success in 157 (85.3%) of the 184 successful tibial accesses. Failed access attempts were more common in women (9 of 13 failures). The rate of successful crossing was roughly equivalent between sexes [84.7% (50/59) women compared to 85.6% (107/125) men]. Technical success did not differ significantly based on a prior failed antegrade attempt: the access success rate was 92.4% (122/132) after a failed antegrade access vs 95.4% (62/65) in those with a primary tibiopedal attempt (p=0.55). Similarly, crossing success was achieved in 82.8% (101/122) after a failed antegrade access vs 90.3% (56/62) for patients with no prior antegrade attempt (p=0.19). Minor complications related to the access site occurred in 11 (5.6%) cases; no patient had access vessel thrombosis, compartment syndrome, or surgical revascularization.

Conclusion: Tibiopedal access appears to be safe and can be used effectively for the crossing of infrainguinal lesions in patients with severe lower limb ischemia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315197PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602816664768DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tibiopedal access
16
antegrade attempt
12
failed antegrade
12
access
10
crossing
8
crossing infrainguinal
8
prospective multicenter
8
multicenter observational
8
observational study
8
access retrograde
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is increasingly prevalent, particularly among the aging population. Retrograde tibiopedal access (RTPA) has emerged as a useful endovascular treatment for PAD. However, there is limited research examining factors that influence the efficacy of RTPA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Retrograde Tibio-Pedal Access for Endovascular Interventions for Treating Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Ann Vasc Surg

October 2024

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME. Electronic address:

Retrograde tibio-pedal access represents a feasible method for endovascular revascularization when antegrade methods fail. The article offers an extensive review of retrograde tibio-pedal access, emphasizing the technique and documented outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

PURPOSE We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of ultrasound (US)-guided retrograde tibial access through chronically occluded tibial arteries as a bailout endovascular recanalization procedure in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS Fifty-one CLI patients with failed conventional antegrade tibiopedal recanalization required retrograde tibiopedal access in the same session. In all of these patients, the target tibial artery was chronically occluded in at least the distal half of the cruris.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes and the tibio-pedal arterial pressure post-endovascular intervention.

Background: Physiological assessment of peripheral arterial lesions is infrequently performed during endovascular interventions.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all 343 patients with intermittent claudication who underwent an endovascular intervention tibio-pedal artery access from October 2018 to May 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare short- and mid-term outcomes of patients with femoropopliteal (FP) occlusive disease treated with a retrograde vs antegrade crossing strategy.

Background: Few studies have directly compared procedural details and outcomes after retrograde vs antegrade crossing of FP lesions.

Methods: Patients undergoing retrograde approaches to FP lesions were identified from the multicenter Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry between 2007 and 2015.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!