Flexible optical intubation via the Ambu Aura-i vs blind intubation via the single-use LMA Fastrach: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

J Clin Anesth

Department of Anesthesiology, UTHealth, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address:

Published: September 2016

Study Objective: This study was designed to compare the Ambu Aura-i to the single-use LMA Fastrach regarding time to intubation, success rate, and airway morbidity in patients undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia.

Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Academic medical center.

Patients: Sixty-five adult patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia.

Interventions: Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group A (n=33) were intubated using Ambu Aura-i and the Ambu aScope 2, a disposable flexible intubating scope, whereas those in group B (n=33) were blindly intubated using the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA).

Measurements: First-attempt intubation success rate, overall intubation success rate, time to intubation, incidence of airway morbidity.

Main Results: The data demonstrated that time for endotracheal intubation in the ILMA group was significantly shorter than in the Ambu Aura-i group (P<.05). There was no difference in the first-attempt intubation success rate (Aura-i=26/33, 78.8%; ILMA=27/33, 81.8%; P=.757) or the overall intubation success rate (Aura-i=29/33, 87.9%; ILMA=31/33, 93.9%; P=.392) between the groups. Four patients (12%) in the Ambu Aura-i group had a failed intubation; 1 was due to a failure of the aScope monitor, whereas 3 were due to inability to visualize the glottis. Two patients (7%) in the ILMA group had a failed intubation due to esophageal intubation. There was no statistically significant difference in airway morbidity between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: The data suggest that intubation with the ILMA is faster but that first-attempt and overall intubation success rates were comparable in both groups. The results suggest that although the flexible intubating scope-guided Aura-i does not outperform blind intubation via the ILMA, the technique is comparable in terms of first-attempt and overall intubation success rate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.01.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ambu aura-i
16
intubation success
12
success rate
12
single-use lma
8
lma fastrach
8
prospective randomized
8
time intubation
8
elective surgery
8
surgery requiring
8
requiring general
8

Similar Publications

Background and aim A novel supraglottic airway device of the second generation is the Ambu® Aura-i™. It is designed to accommodate standard cuffed tracheal tubes and is phthalate-free and compatible with MRI. The primary objectives of the research were to examine the properties and efficiency of Ambu® Aura-i™ as a means of enabling fiberoptic-guided intubation, the view of the glottis during fiber optic examination, the duration of intubation in fiber optic bronchoscopy, the ease of intubation, the success rate of intubation, and the duration for device removal from the tracheal tube.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Supraglottic airway (SGA) devices are good alternatives for failed intubations or difficult airways. The aim of our study was to compare the success of intubation with SGA devices such as LMA Fastrach (LMA Fastrach), Ambu Aura-i (Aura-i), and Cookgas Air-Q (Air-Q) in an airway manikin by novice practitioners.

Methods: This study was conducted in a randomized crossover design using a manikin model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Ambu Aura-i laryngeal mask is considered to be a device for blind intubation as well as for fiberoptic guided intubation. The novel video laryngeal airway mask SaCoVLM is a supraglottic airway device that allows intubation under direct vision. We hypothesized that success rates for device placement and tracheal intubation with the SaCoVLM would be comparable with the Ambu Aura-i mask.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Neuroanaesthesiologists are faced with managing and optimising the intracranial pressure in the perioperative period. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are known to increase sympathetic activity that is well tolerated by healthy patients but may be detrimental to many comorbid patients. We, therefore, hypothesised that airway management and tracheal intubation through Ambu Aura-I (Ambu, Baltorpbakken 13, Denmark) may be associated with lesser changes in optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) compared to conventional tracheal intubation and designed a study to ultrasonographically measure the changes in optic nerve sheath diameter following tracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope or fibreoptic-guided intubation through Ambu Aura-I in patients receiving endotracheal anaesthesia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!