Taxonomic evaluation of eleven species of Microcyclops Claus, 1893 (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and description of Microcyclops inarmatus sp. n. from America.

Zookeys

Universidad de Quintana Roo (UQROO), Unidad Cozumel, Av. Andrés Quintana Roo s/n, 77600, Cozumel, Quintana Roo México.

Published: August 2016

Description and meristic analysis of eleven species of Microcyclops recorded in America were performed based on the examination of type specimens and fresh material. Microscopic analysis of oral appendages, such as the shape and armature of the distal coxal endite of the maxilla, the ornamentation on the caudal surface of the antenna, and the intercoxal sclerites and armament of the inner basis of all swimming appendages, were characteristics that allowed the differentiation between species. Among these species, our study confirmed the synonymy of Microcyclops diversus Kiefer, 1935 with Microcyclops ceibaensis (Marsh, 1919). The results of our observations showed that Microcyclops alius (Kiefer, 1935) is a junior synonym of Microcyclops dubitabilis Kiefer, 1934; the latter being confirmed as a valid species. Also, it is proposed that the records of Microcyclops rubellus (Lilljeborg, 1901) and Microcyclops varicans (Sars, 1863) in America should be revised as there are serious doubts about their distribution in America. The analysis suggested that Microcyclops anceps pauxensis Herbst, 1962 is distinct from Microcyclops anceps var. minor Dussart, 1984 and that both are likely different from Microcyclops anceps anceps (Richard, 1897). Finally a full morphological description of adult females of Microcyclops inarmatus sp. n. is presented.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978000PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.603.7480DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

microcyclops
13
microcyclops anceps
12
eleven species
8
species microcyclops
8
microcyclops inarmatus
8
kiefer 1935
8
species
5
taxonomic evaluation
4
evaluation eleven
4
microcyclops claus
4

Similar Publications

Redescription of two species of (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and use of ordination models to classify American species.

Zookeys

August 2023

Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Quintana Roo (UQROO), Campus Cozumel, Av. Andrés Quintana Roo s/n, 77600, Cozumel, Quintana Roo, Mexico Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Quintana Roo Cozumel Mexico.

Two species of the freshwater copepod genus are redescribed, Dussart, 1984, and Dussart, 1984 from type specimens. Redescription includes the microstructure of intercoxal sclerites and the basipodites of thoracic appendages, as well as the urosomal microstructure. According to the cluster (UPGMA and Euclidean distance) and PCA analyses performed, it was possible to improve the resolution between the American species by considering characters such as the distal region of antennal basis, the maxillary ornamentation, and the thoracic appendages, especially the intercoxal sclerites and medial margin of the basipodite of the first to fourth trunk limbs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Taxonomic evaluation of eleven species of Microcyclops Claus, 1893 (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and description of Microcyclops inarmatus sp. n. from America.

Zookeys

August 2016

Universidad de Quintana Roo (UQROO), Unidad Cozumel, Av. Andrés Quintana Roo s/n, 77600, Cozumel, Quintana Roo México.

Description and meristic analysis of eleven species of Microcyclops recorded in America were performed based on the examination of type specimens and fresh material. Microscopic analysis of oral appendages, such as the shape and armature of the distal coxal endite of the maxilla, the ornamentation on the caudal surface of the antenna, and the intercoxal sclerites and armament of the inner basis of all swimming appendages, were characteristics that allowed the differentiation between species. Among these species, our study confirmed the synonymy of Microcyclops diversus Kiefer, 1935 with Microcyclops ceibaensis (Marsh, 1919).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Response of copepod community characteristics to environmental factors in the Backshore Wetland of Expo Garden, Shanghai].

Huan Jing Ke Xue

November 2012

Key Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Education, Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.

The Backshore Wetland of Expo Garden was the emphasis of the World Expo construction project in Shanghai in 2010, China programming district. We carried out studies on the community structure and spatial-temporal variation of copepod from September 2009 to August 2010. Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) was used for relevant statistical analysis between physicochemical parameters and copepod standing crop.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Longitudinal distribution of Copepoda populations in the transition zone of Paranapanema River and Jurumirim Reservoir (São Paulo, Brazil) and interchange with two lateral lakes.

Braz J Biol

February 2004

Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (UNESP), CEP 18618-000, Rubião Júnior, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

Longitudinal changes in composition, abundance, and distribution of copepods were studied at the transition zone of Paranapanema River-Jurumirim Reservoir (SP, Brazil). The interchange of biotic material between marginal lakes and the river system was also examined. Water samples were obtained from 6 stations along a stretch of 13 km of the Paranapanema River, from an upstream reach with high water velocity up to the river mouth into Jurumirim Reservoir.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cyclopidae (Crustacea, Copepoda) from the upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil.

Braz J Biol

February 2002

Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Nupélia, Department of Biology, Postgraduate Course in Ecology of Continental Aquatic Environments, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, Brazil.

Cyclopid copepods from samples of fauna associated with aquatic macrophytes and plancton obtained in lotic and lentic environments were obtained from the upper Paraná River floodplain (in the states of Paraná and Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil). Macrophytes were collected in homogeneous stands and washed. Plankton samples, taken from the water column surface and bottom, were obtained using a motor pump, with a 70 microns mesh plankton net for filtration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!