Objectives: To determine the variations in the management of patients with minor head injuries across a Trauma Network.

Methods: An 18-point questionnaire covering aspects of hospital care and follow-up of patients with minor head injuries was sent out to 19 wards in 10 different trauma units within our network.

Results: Fifty-eight percent of wards routinely admitting patients with minor head injuries have no management protocol in place. Mild head injury patients stay for 24-48 h as in-patients. Fifty percent of wards use GCS as the only assessment tool. Seventy-four percent of wards give post-head injury advice to their discharged patients with mild head injuries, but only 26% follow their patients up locally and 16% refer minor head injury patients to the specialist neurotrauma clinic. Twenty one percent of wards give information to their head injury patients regarding supporting organisations and charities. Seventy-four percent of ward staff report being confident in looking after head injury patients. All wards would welcome a head injury study day or an in-house education event.

Conclusion: Management of minor head injury patients in trauma units should be standardised and neurosurgical units within Major Trauma Centres (MTC) need to lead in protocol based management of these patients across their network. NICE currently provide guidance detailing local management of head injuries not requiring immediate admission to the MTC. We believe it is the role of the neurosurgical centre to work with trauma units and provide guidelines and standards of practice to ensure optimal management of this vulnerable population group. In addition, the neuroscience centre has a role in ensuring staff education and on-going professional development across Trauma Networks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2016.1211249DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

minor head
24
head injury
24
head injuries
20
injury patients
20
percent wards
16
head
12
patients minor
12
trauma units
12
patients
11
management minor
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Health disparities experienced by lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals have been partially attributed to healthcare professionals' lack of cultural competence in addressing their specific needs. This study aimed to assess the differences in competencies and preparedness among health professionals from Poland and Spain when working with LGBT patients.

Methodology: Data were collected between June and August 2024 through a cross-sectional survey involving 673 health professionals (Mage = 33.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Every year, around 300 million surgeries are conducted worldwide, with an estimated 4.2 million deaths occurring within 30 days after surgery. Adequate patient education is crucial, but often falls short due to the stress patients experience before surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Outcome of Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula Treatment After Esophageal Atresia Repair.

J Pediatr Surg

January 2025

Congenital Oesophageal and Airway Team Utrecht, Departments of Paediatric Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Introduction: Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula (rTEF) is a complication of Esophageal Atresia (EA) that can lead to severe respiratory symptoms. RTEF can be corrected via endotracheal treatment (ET) or surgical treatment (ST). The efficacy of these techniques varies in literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Access to trained lymphedema care providers remains limited making patient-driven management solutions essential. One such option, sequential intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), has gained traction as a supportive tool for lymphedema management. While newer IPC devices and innovative applications are being introduced to the market, questions regarding the safety and efficacy of this technology persist.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure in otorhinolaryngology. A Danish version would serve as a validated tool for assessing quality of life among Danish patients after otorhinolaryngological interventions, enabling both cross-intervention, cross-country and cross-cultural comparisons.

Aims/objectives: This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt and linguistically validate the GBI into Danish.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!