Purpose: To quantify the accuracy of extracted target motion trajectories in dual-source four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) by comparison with the actual three-dimensional (3D) target motion acquired simultaneously during 4D-CBCT scan.

Materials And Methods: 4D-CBCT scans were performed for 19 different sinusoidal-like patterns and 13 lung cancer patients with implanted markers. Internal (In) or external (Ex) surrogates with amplitude (Amp)- or phase (Ph)-based sorting were used for the reconstructions. The targets were a pseudo-tumor and implanted marker for the phantom and clinical studies, respectively. The accuracy was evaluated by determining the maximum error (MaxE) between the 3D target position extracted from 4D-CBCT and the actual 3D target position detected by fluoroscopy in each ith phase (0⩽i⩽7).

Results: Median peak-to-peak target displacements in the superior-inferior (SI) direction were 20.6 and 20.6mm in the phantom and clinical studies, respectively. In the phantom and clinical studies, the maximum of median MaxEs in the SI direction was 4.6 and 9.2mm in the In_Ph reconstruction. In the clinical study, the maximum of median MaxEs was observed during the end-inhalation phase among all reconstruction approaches.

Conclusions: This study showed the magnitude of underestimation toward the inferior direction of target motion in clinical 4D-CBCT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

target motion
16
phantom clinical
12
clinical studies
12
accuracy extracted
8
extracted target
8
motion trajectories
8
four-dimensional cone-beam
8
cone-beam computed
8
computed tomography
8
lung cancer
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!