As one of the most common dermatologic chronic-recurrent disease, variable therapeutic options are available today for management of psoriasis. Although topical high potency corticosteroids, alone or in association with salicylic acid or vitamin D analogues, are still considered the best treatment, they do not seem to possess the capability for a long-term control of the disease or prevent recurrences, as their side effects are major contraindications for continuative use. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Dr. Michaels® product family is comparable to methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA) as a viable alternative treatment option for the treatment and management of stable chronic plaque psoriasis. Thirty adults (13 male, 17 female, mean age 40 years) with mild to severe stable chronic plaque psoriasis, were included in the study. Patients were advised to treat the lesions of the two sides of their body (left and right) with two different unknown modalities for 8 weeks; the pack of Dr. Michaels® products on the left side (consisting of a cleansing gel, an ointment and a skin conditioner) and a placebo pack on the right side, consisting of a cleansing gel, methylprednisolone ointment and a placebo conditioner. Assessment was done using the Psoriasis Activity Severity Index (PASI) scores before treatment and after 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. The results achieved with the Dr. Michaels® (Soratinex®) product family for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis were better than the results achieved with methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA), even though quicker resolution was achieved with the steroid with 45% of patients achieving resolution within 8-10 days in comparison to 5-6 weeks in the Dr. Michaels® (Soratinex®) group. Before therapy, the mean PASI score of the LHS in Dr. Michaels® (Soratinex®) group was 13.8±4.1 SD and 14.2±4.2 SD in the RHS methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA) group. After 8 weeks of treatment 62% of the Dr. Michaels® (Soratinex®) group had achieved resolution whilst in the methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA) group, the figure remained at 45%. The mean PASI score after 8 weeks of treatment was calculated and in the LHS Dr. Michaels® (Soratinex®) group it was 2.8±1.6 SD and 6.8±2.4 SD in the RHS methylprednisolone aceponate group. In the RHS -methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA) group, 22% of patients failed to respond to the treatment in comparison to 6% in the LHS Dr. Michaels® (Soratinex®) group. Based on the results of this study, Dr. Michaels® products are a more effective treatment option, with insignificant side effects, compared to local treatment with methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Dermatologie (Heidelb)
July 2024
Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (IVDP), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Deutschland.
Background: Data on the course of urticaria in children exist, but there is a lack of sound data on patient management to ensure high-quality care.
Methods: Retrospective secondary data analysis in the field of health care and epidemiology in children with urticaria based on routine data from a German health insurance company (DAK-Gesundheit). Data from insured persons under 18 years of age who were treated as outpatients or inpatients with a diagnosis of urticaria (according to ICD-10 classification) in 2010-2015 were included.
Contact Dermatitis
February 2024
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Background: Overall adherence in the treatment of chronic dermatoses is poor. Textbooks state an adherence dependence on galenics.
Trial Design: Prospective, randomized, parallel-grouped, single-blinded (investigator), monocentric clinical trial (phase IV) on the adherence to treatment of chronic mild to moderate hand eczema with topical methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA, Advantan®) in different vehicles.
Mol Pharm
August 2022
Biopharmaceutics Research Institute, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6139, South Africa.
The widespread use of topical corticosteroids (TCs) in dermatotherapy requires a consideration of their potency and benefit/risk ratios. Although there are a variety of topical corticosteroid products (TCPs) available on the market and their potencies are ranked using different classification systems, to our knowledge, no classification system to rank the inherent potencies of TC active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) currently exists. Most of the published classification systems for TCPs are based on randomized clinical comparative studies and/or vasoconstrictor assay (VCA) data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrol J
August 2021
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of topical steroid therapy according to potency as the first-line treatment for boys with symptomatic phimosis.
Materials And Methods: From April 2017 to March 2019, we retrospectively reviewed 45 boys with severe phimosis (Kikiros retractability grade 4 or 5) who presented with phimosis-related complications. During the first year of the study period, methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA, Advantan®, potent topical steroid) was administered in 24 boys.
Skin Pharmacol Physiol
January 2022
Department of Clinical Sensoring and Monitoring, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Introduction: Proactive therapy with topical corticosteroids (TCSs) is the standard treatment for chronic inflammatory diseases such as atopic dermatitis; however, skin atrophy as TCS side effect remains a concern.
Methods: This 16-week, evaluator-blinded, within-patient placebo-controlled, randomized study enrolled volunteers with healthy skin conditions. For 12 weeks, their volar forearm and the back of their hand were applied with hydrocortisone acetate 1% cream (HC), methylprednisolone aceponate 0.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!