AI Article Synopsis

  • The human visual system has specific regions for processing textures, which provide key insights into environmental and material properties.
  • Recent research shows a significant connection between texture features and high-level aesthetic judgments, such as beauty and roughness, which is gaining attention in both psychological and applied fields like design.
  • Experiments indicated that about 75% of the variability in perceived texture qualities is explained by a two-dimensional judgment space, highlighting that observers utilize a limited internal scale for aesthetic evaluations; specific texture features correlate with beauty and roughness ratings.

Article Abstract

Our world is filled with texture. For the human visual system, this is an important source of information for assessing environmental and material properties. Indeed-and presumably for this reason-the human visual system has regions dedicated to processing textures. Despite their abundance and apparent relevance, only recently the relationships between texture features and high-level judgments have captured the interest of mainstream science, despite long-standing indications for such relationships. In this study, we explore such relationships, as these might be used to predict perceived texture qualities. This is relevant, not only from a psychological/neuroscience perspective, but also for more applied fields such as design, architecture, and the visual arts. In two separate experiments, observers judged various qualities of visual textures such as beauty, roughness, naturalness, elegance, and complexity. Based on factor analysis, we find that in both experiments, ~75% of the variability in the judgments could be explained by a two-dimensional space, with axes that are closely aligned to the beauty and roughness judgments. That a two-dimensional judgment space suffices to capture most of the variability in the perceived texture qualities suggests that observers use a relatively limited set of internal scales on which to base various judgments, including aesthetic ones. Finally, for both of these judgments, we determined the relationship with a large number of texture features computed for each of the texture stimuli. We find that the presence of lower spatial frequencies, oblique orientations, higher intensity variation, higher saturation, and redness correlates with higher beauty ratings. Features that captured image intensity and uniformity correlated with roughness ratings. Therefore, a number of computational texture features are predictive of these judgments. This suggests that perceived texture qualities-including the aesthetic appreciation-are sufficiently universal to be predicted-with reasonable accuracy-based on the computed feature content of the textures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4954813PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00343DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

perceived texture
16
texture qualities
12
texture features
12
texture
10
human visual
8
visual system
8
beauty roughness
8
judgments
6
visual
5
aesthetics numbers
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!