A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 144

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3106
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Weekly vinorelbine and paclitaxel in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II Fred and Pamela Buffet Cancer Center Clinical Trials Network study. | LitMetric

Weekly vinorelbine and paclitaxel in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II Fred and Pamela Buffet Cancer Center Clinical Trials Network study.

J Geriatr Oncol

Department of Medicine, VA Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States; Early Phase Therapeutic Clinical Trial Unit, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, Omaha, NE, United States. Electronic address:

Published: January 2017

Objective: Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is the standard for most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Toxicity concerns limit chemotherapy for patients over 70years. Vinorelbine and paclitaxel are effective as single agents in advanced NSCLC. This phase II study evaluates safety and efficacy of a combination of these two agents in patients >70years with advanced NSCLC.

Materials And Methods: Patients with treatment naïve metastatic NSCLC received two cycles comprising 6 weekly doses of vinorelbine and paclitaxel, with restaging scans at week 8. Patients with radiographic progression came off study. The estimated sample size was 29. Toxicity analyses were conducted after 10 patients and again after 19 patients were enrolled. Outcomes were safety and efficacy, progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QOL).

Results: The study closed at second interim analysis as 6/19 patients had ≥grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity (respiratory failure, sepsis, ischemic encephalopathy, pneumonia, hypoxemia, cardiopulmonary arrest, neutropenic fever, death). Of the 16 evaluable patients, 7 completed the study. Disease control rate (partial response+stable disease) was 47% (n=9); 37% (n=7) progressed. No complete responses were seen. Median PFS was 3.5months (95% CI: 1.4, 5.5) and OS 7.8months (95% CI: 1.9, 13.6). QOL did not change compared to baseline, at week 9, but increased at week 17.

Conclusions: Although the combination met its response end points, increased toxicity makes this combination unsuitable for older patients. While QOL improved over the study, the small sample hinders interpretation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2016.07.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vinorelbine paclitaxel
12
patients
11
older patients
8
patients advanced
8
advanced non-small
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
safety efficacy
8
study
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!