[Analysis of the results of the HIV-1, HCV and HBV viral load of SEIMC External Quality Control Program. Year 2014].

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin

Programa de Control de Calidad Externo SEIMC; Servicio de Microbiología, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España; Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España.

Published: July 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • HIV-1, HBV, and HCV viral load determinations are essential for monitoring infected patients, with external quality control ensuring laboratory accuracy.
  • In the 2014 SEIMC External Quality Control Programme, 30.8% of laboratories reported results outside the accepted range for HIV-1, while repeatability was high with 95.8% within limits.
  • For HBV and HCV, the majority of laboratories (83.7% and 87.9% respectively) presented results within the accepted range, highlighting the importance of proficiency programs in maintaining laboratory quality and the need for consistent methods in patient follow-up.

Article Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarizes the results obtained from the 2014 SEIMC (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads. In the HIV-1 program, a total of 5 standards were sent. One standard consisted in seronegative human plasma, while the remaining 4 contained plasma from 3 different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; 2 of these standards were identical aiming to determine repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (30.8% on average) obtained values out of the accepted range (mean ± 0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was excellent, with up to 95.8% of laboratories reporting results within the limits (Δ < 0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV program consisted of 2 standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 83.7% in the case of HCV and 87.9% in the HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean ± 1.96 standard deviations log10 IU/mL). Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory, as well as the importance of the post-analytical phase on the overall quality. Due to the remarkable interlaboratory variability, it is advisable to use the same method and the same laboratory for patient follow up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0213-005X(16)30213-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

viral load
12
external quality
12
quality control
12
log10 copies/ml
12
hiv-1 hcv
8
hcv hbv
8
hbv viral
8
hepatitis virus
8
accepted range
8
hcv
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!