This case report presents conservative management of unset mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) after being placed as a root-end filling material following periapical surgery. Periapical surgery was indicated for a maxillary lateral incisor of a 15-year-old male due to persistent exudate and a large periapical lesion. During surgery Angelus MTA was placed as root-end filling. The next session it was noticed that MTA had failed to completely set. In an orthograde approach, calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement was used to obturate the root canal space. The patient was followed up for 27 months and did not exhibit any clinical signs and symptoms. Radiographic images showed complete healing of the lesion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947853PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2016.03.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

root-end filling
12
conservative management
8
management unset
8
unset mineral
8
mineral trioxide
8
trioxide aggregate
8
case report
8
mta root-end
8
periapical surgery
8
aggregate root-end
4

Similar Publications

This report highlights successful management of a rare case of a mandibular premolar with Oehler's Type IIIb Dens Invaginatus (DI) and peri-invagination periodontitis with guided intentional replantation without root canal treatment. A 22-year-old female patient reported with discomfort and a sinus tract associated with tooth number 21. Clinical examination and cone beam computed tomography revealed tooth number 21 had an Oehler's Type IIIb DI with peri-invagination periodontitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects.

Biomater Investig Dent

October 2024

Section of Endodontics, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

The placement of root filling materials aims to prevent the occurrence of post-treatment apical periodontitis following completion of endodontic treatment. Materials should possess properties that will not permit bacterial invasion and infection, namely excellent sealing ability and/or antibacterial properties. In root-end filling procedures or repair of root perforations, the root filling materials are placed in a particularly challenging clinical environment, as they interface with a relatively large area with the periradicular tissues.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal (Coltene/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) in achieving an apical seal when utilized as a retrograde filling material in comparison to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Methods Twenty single-rooted single-canaled human teeth were randomly allocated into two equal groups according to the used retrograde filling materials: Guttaflow Bioseal in group I and MTA in group II. The crowns were sectioned, and the root canals were prepared with rotary files and obturated (single cone technique with a resin-based sealer).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The absence of a barrier in an open root apex makes endodontic treatment challenging as root-filling material can easily reach the surrounding tissue. The aim of the study was to compare the apical microleakage associated with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), biodentine, custom-made gutta-percha with MTA plus and custom-made gutta-percha with Adseal in immature permanent teeth by dye penetration method. Apical 2 mm of 60 single-rooted mandibular premolar teeth was resected to create divergent open apices and 10 teeth each were filled with Biodentine plug, MTA plug, custom-made gutta-percha with MTA plus sealer and custom-made gutta-percha with Adseal sealer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study assesses how combining various bioactive root-end filling materials with a composite bone graft influences healing in periapical tissues following endodontic microsurgery, using a triple-blinded clinical trial design.
  • 56 patients, aged 20 to 50 with specific dental issues, were randomly divided into two main groups based on root-end filling materials (MTA vs. TotalFill) and further split into subgroups with or without bone grafts.
  • After 12 months, the results showed no significant differences in healing or success rates across the groups, with no adverse effects reported.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!