Objective: To compare the effect of corticosteroids combined with local anaesthetic versus local anaesthetic alone during infiltrations of the pudendal nerve for pudendal nerve entrapment.
Design: Randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.
Setting: Multicentre study.
Population: 201 patients were included in the study, with a subgroup of 122 women.
Methods: CT-guided pudendal nerve infiltrations were performed in the sacrospinous ligament and Alcock's canal. There were three study arms: patients in Arm A (n = 68) had local anaesthetic alone, those in Arm B (n = 66) had local anaesthetic plus corticosteroid and those in Arm C (n = 67) local anaesthetic plus corticosteroid with a large volume of normal saline.
Main Outcome Measures: The primary end-point was the pain intensity score at 3 months. Patients were regarded as responders (at least a 30-point improvement on a 100-point visual analogue scale of mean maximum pain over a 2-week period) or nonresponders.
Results: Three months' postinfiltration, 11.8% of patients in the local anaesthetic only arm (Arm A) were responders versus 14.3% in the local anaesthetic plus corticosteroid arms (Arms B and C). This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.62). No statistically significant difference was observed in the female subgroup between Arm A and Arms B and C (P = 0.09). No significant difference was detected for the various pain assessment procedures, functional criteria or quality-of-life criteria.
Conclusions: Corticosteroids provide no additional therapeutic benefits compared with local anaesthetic and should therefore no longer be used.
Tweetable Abstract: Steroid infiltrations do not improve the results of local anaesthetic infiltrations in pudendal neuralgia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215631 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14222 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!