Health documentation is a prerequisite for good and sustainable health and social care. It is especially important for patient involvement and their empowerment. A transition from paper to e-documentation together with the electronic patient record should be based on thorough knowledge of the current state of documentation and its usages. The main objective of this paper was to analyse which documents and work methods of documenting processes within nursing are being used within different environments. Furthermore, what are the main reasons for their discrepancies from theoretical approaches and best practices. The analysis is based on a survey carried out on all three levels of healthcare. The survey questionnaire consisted of 12 questions to which responded 286 nursing teams from community health centres, hospitals and retirement homes in Slovenia. The results point to diversity in documenting as well as lack of interoperability. This is reflected in a great number of different documents. All phases of the nursing process were being documented in only 31.8 % of cases. The main reasons for this can be attributed to work organisation, different definitions of data-set requirements and inadequate knowledge by nurses. Survey results pointed out a need for the renewal of nursing documentation towards a more uniform system based on contemporary health technologies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0546-x | DOI Listing |
Nurs Rep
November 2024
Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad de Murcia, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Unlabelled: Standardized transfer is an evidence-based framework designed to improve communication between healthcare professionals, reducing risks and ensuring safe, high-quality care. Despite its benefits, implementing this framework in clinical practice poses challenges. Nurses often do not use a systematic guide as a theoretical framework for handovers in daily practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Nurs Knowl
December 2024
Direction of Health Professions, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the revised quality of nursing diagnosis, interventions, and outcomes (Q-DIO R) instrument, designed to measure the quality of nursing documentation, in an Italian healthcare setting.
Methods: The study followed a multi-phase validation process that included translation and cultural adaptation of the tool, expert evaluations to assess content and face validity, and a cross-sectional study to test reliability. Data were collected from nursing documentation in two hospitals in northern Italy, with 389 patient plans analyzed.
Appl Clin Inform
October 2024
College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Background: The integration of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into clinical care, particularly in the context of cancer and multimorbidity, is crucial. While PROs have the potential to enhance patient-centered care and improve health outcomes through improved symptom assessment, they are not always adequately documented by the health care team.
Objectives: This study aimed to explore the concordance between patient-reported symptom occurrence and symptoms documented in electronic health records (EHRs) in people undergoing treatment for cancer in the context of multimorbidity.
Afr J Emerg Med
December 2024
Department of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Introduction: In an emergency room, triage is a crucial element that determines the clinical urgency of patients. Triage can dictate important decisions on the use of resources and the treatment that patients need. Many patients are seen later than necessary, wasting resources and time, and some may even be discharged without being seen, risking their lives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFContemp Clin Trials Commun
December 2024
College of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Community engagement is increasingly considered a key component of intervention development, as it can leverage community members' knowledge, experiences, and insights to create a nuanced intervention which meets the needs, preferences, and realities of the population of interest. Community engagement exists along a spectrum from outreach to the community to partnership with community members and organizations, and all levels of community engagement can benefit from systematic documentation of community feedback and decision-making processes. This paper demonstrates how we utilized the "Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Interventions" (FRAME; Wiltsey Stirman et al.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!