Phase III Randomized Trial of Ipilimumab Plus Etoposide and Platinum Versus Placebo Plus Etoposide and Platinum in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

J Clin Oncol

Martin Reck, LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, Grosshansdorf; Michael Thomas, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Thoraxklinik im Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Alexander Luft, Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, Leningrad, Russia; Aleksandra Szczesna, Mazowieckie Centrum Leczenia Chorob Pluc i Gruzlicy w Otwocku, Otwocku, Poland; Libor Havel, Hospital Na Bulovce, Prague, Czech Republic; Sang-We Kim, Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Wallace Akerley, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Maria Catherine Pietanza, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Kathryn Gold, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Leora Horn, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; David Spigel, Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Anne Pieters, Teresa Kong Sanchez, and Justin Fairchild, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ; Yi-long Wu, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong, People's Republic of China; Christoph Zielinski, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Enriqueta Felip, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Joachim Aerts, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Kinki University Hospital, Osaka, Japan; and Paul Lorigan, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Published: November 2016

Purpose Patients with extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have poor survival outcomes despite first-line chemotherapy with etoposide and platinum. This randomized, double-blind phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab or placebo plus etoposide and platinum in patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage disease SCLC. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned at a ratio of one to one to receive chemotherapy with etoposide and platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) plus ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for a total of four doses each in a phased induction schedule (chemotherapy in cycles one to four; ipilimumab or placebo beginning in cycle three up to cycle six), followed by ipilimumab or placebo maintenance every 12 weeks. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) among patients receiving at least one dose of blinded study therapy. Results Of 1,132 patients randomly assigned, 954 received at least one dose of study therapy (chemotherapy plus ipilimumab, n = 478; chemotherapy plus placebo, n = 476). Median OS was 11.0 months for chemotherapy plus ipilimumab versus 10.9 months for chemotherapy plus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.09; P = .3775). Median progression-free survival was 4.6 months for chemotherapy plus ipilimumab versus 4.4 months for chemotherapy plus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.97). Rates and severity of treatment-related adverse events were similar between arms, except for diarrhea, rash, and colitis, which were more frequent with chemotherapy plus ipilimumab. Rate of treatment-related discontinuation was higher with chemotherapy plus ipilimumab (18% v 2% with chemotherapy plus placebo). Five treatment-related deaths occurred with chemotherapy plus ipilimumab and two with chemotherapy plus placebo. Conclusion Addition of ipilimumab to chemotherapy did not prolong OS versus chemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage disease SCLC. No new or unexpected adverse events were observed with chemotherapy plus ipilimumab. Several ongoing studies are evaluating ipilimumab in combination with programmed death-1 inhibitors in SCLC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.6601DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chemotherapy ipilimumab
28
etoposide platinum
20
chemotherapy placebo
20
chemotherapy
17
months chemotherapy
16
ipilimumab
14
extensive-stage disease
12
ipilimumab placebo
12
placebo
10
phase iii
8

Similar Publications

Background: CheckMate 8HW prespecified dual primary endpoints, assessed in patients with centrally confirmed microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient status: progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with chemotherapy as first-line therapy and progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with nivolumab alone, regardless of previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease. In our previous report, nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed superior progression-free survival versus chemotherapy in first-line microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer in the CheckMate 8HW trial. Here, we report results from the prespecified interim analysis for the other primary endpoint of progression-free survival for nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab across all treatment lines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Research into the role of probiotics-often referred to as "living supplements"-in cancer therapy is still in its early stages, and uncertainties regarding their effectiveness remain. Relevantly, chemopreventive and therapeutic effects of probiotics have been determined. There is also substantial evidence supporting their potential in cancer treatment such as immunotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved the therapeutic arsenal in outpatient oncology care; however, data on necessity of hospitalizations associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are scarce. Here, we characterized hospitalizations of patients undergoing ICI, from the prospective cohort study of the immune cooperative oncology group (ICOG) Hannover.

Methods: Between 12/2019 and 06/2022, 237 patients were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We report the basal cell cancer (BCC) cohort of the SWOG/NCI 1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART), a phase II prospective, multicenter basket trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors are difficult to predict and can lead to severe events. Although it is important to develop strategies for the early detection of severe irAEs, there is a lack of evidence on irAEs associated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between eosinophil and severe irAEs in patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy for RCC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!