Background: Four-corner fusion is a rational surgical option for the management of degenerative conditions of the wrist. Most related studies have compared four-corner fusion with scaphoid excision or proximal row carpectomy, with a variety of reported results. To enhance the literature, we performed this study to evaluate a series of patients with degenerative conditions of the wrist treated with four-corner fusion using 3 surgical techniques and to discuss the clinical and radiographic outcome of the patients.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively studied 31 patients (24 men, 7 women; mean age, 43 years; 9 heavy manual laborers) who underwent four-corner fusion of their wrists for degenerative conditions from 2005 to 2015. Internal fixation was done using multiple Kirschner wires (14 patients), headless compressive screws (8 patients), or a circular plate (9 patients). Mean follow-up was 4 years (1-11 years). We evaluated the clinical outcome with the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score and fusion with radiographs.

Results: All patients experienced improvement of their pain, function, range of motion and grip strength (p < 0.05). Twenty-three patients (74 %) reported no pain, and eight patients reported mild, occasional pain. Twenty-one patients (68 %) were able to do usual and specific activities. Mean wrist motion improved to 70 % and mean grip strength improved to 85 % of opposite wrist. Two heavy manual labor patients requested a job modification because of wrist impairment. Radiographs of the wrist showed fusion of all fused joints in 28 (90.3 %) patients and partial fusion in three patients (9.7 %). No patient with partial fusion required a reoperation for symptomatic nonunion until the period of this study. Three patients experienced complications (10 %). Two patients treated with a circular plate experienced complex regional pain syndrome and painful implant impingement; another patient treated with Kirschner wires and headless compression screws experienced radiolunate arthritis from impingement of the lunate screw to the radius.

Conclusions: Four-corner fusion is a reliable limited wrist fusion technique that provides pain relief, grip strength and satisfactory range of motion in patients with degenerative conditions of the wrist. Partial union is more common with Kirschner wire fixation and complications are more common with circular plate fixation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1824-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

four-corner fusion
20
degenerative conditions
12
clinical radiographic
8
radiographic outcome
8
conditions wrist
8
patients
7
four-corner
5
fusion
5
wrist
4
fusion wrist
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Four-corner fusion has long been the preferred treatment for stages II and III of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse with intact radiolunate articulation. Three corner fusions were then proposed as a more limited procedure with improved ulnar deviation through triquetrum excision. However, we believe triquetrum preservation would decrease the radiolunate contact pressure without affecting the ulnar deviation range.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Robot-assisted technique can achieve accurate screw placement in four-corner fusion and reduce operative difficulty: a cadaver study.

J Orthop Surg Res

November 2024

Department of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.31, Xin Jie Kou East Street, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100035, China.

Background: The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility and accuracy of a robot-assisted technique in four-corner fusion compared with traditional freehand operation.

Methods: Twenty cadaver specimens were randomly assigned to the robot-assisted group and freehand groups. Three screws were placed percutaneously to fix the capitate-lunate joint, lunate-triquetrum joint, and triquetrum-hamate-capitate joint in each specimen by robot-assisted or freehand technique.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study compared the Amandys® implant and four-corner fusion in patients over 50 with grade 3 wrist osteoarthritis, followed for 5 years, focusing on pain, mobility, strength, and satisfaction.
  • Amandys® showed improved wrist extension and grip strength at the last follow-up, while four-corner fusion resulted in decreased flexion.
  • Amandys® had shorter immobilization periods and better mobility outcomes, suggesting it may be a suitable alternative for older patients compared to four-corner fusion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Four-corner arthrodesis is commonly performed for advanced collapse patterns of wrist arthritis. Reduction of the capitolunate (CL) angle during four-corner fusion is crucial to allow for the greatest radiocarpal joint arc of motion. Previous studies demonstrate variable inter- and intraobserver reliability of measuring the CL angle.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the effectiveness of the Ni-Ti shape memory alloy four-corner arthrodesis concentrator (NT-FCAC) for treating scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) with a decade-long follow-up.
  • Twenty-six patients underwent surgery involving scaphoidectomy and arthrodesis, showing significant improvements in grip strength, wrist mobility, and reduced pain levels postoperatively.
  • Over a 10-15 year follow-up, all patients achieved wrist bone fusion with no severe complications, although no significant changes in pain and functionality were observed after 60 months.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!