AI Article Synopsis

  • The paper addresses the challenge of parameter inference in biological pathways modeled by ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and presents a new adaptive gradient matching approach using Gaussian processes to reduce computational costs.
  • The methodology includes a comparison with existing state-of-the-art techniques, notably the reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) method, and emphasizes the impact of different experimental setups on the robustness of these approaches.
  • The results indicate that the Gaussian processes method outperforms others when noise variance is known, while the RKHS method shows greater robustness when the noise variance is unknown.

Article Abstract

Background: A challenging problem in current systems biology is that of parameter inference in biological pathways expressed as coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Conventional methods that repeatedly numerically solve the ODEs have large associated computational costs. Aimed at reducing this cost, new concepts using gradient matching have been proposed, which bypass the need for numerical integration. This paper presents a recently established adaptive gradient matching approach, using Gaussian processes (GPs), combined with a parallel tempering scheme, and conducts a comparative evaluation with current state-of-the-art methods used for parameter inference in ODEs. Among these contemporary methods is a technique based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS). This has previously shown promising results for parameter estimation, but under lax experimental settings. We look at a range of scenarios to test the robustness of this method. We also change the approach of inferring the penalty parameter from AIC to cross validation to improve the stability of the method.

Methods: Methodology for the recently proposed adaptive gradient matching method using GPs, upon which we build our new method, is provided. Details of a competing method using RKHS are also described here.

Results: We conduct a comparative analysis for the methods described in this paper, using two benchmark ODE systems. The analyses are repeated under different experimental settings, to observe the sensitivity of the techniques.

Conclusions: Our study reveals that for known noise variance, our proposed method based on GPs and parallel tempering achieves overall the best performance. When the noise variance is unknown, the RKHS method proves to be more robust.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4959362PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0186-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gradient matching
16
parameter inference
12
systems biology
8
comparative evaluation
8
adaptive gradient
8
parallel tempering
8
experimental settings
8
noise variance
8
method
6
approximate parameter
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!