A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

In vitro evaluation of fluid reflux after flushing different types of needleless connectors. | LitMetric

In vitro evaluation of fluid reflux after flushing different types of needleless connectors.

J Vasc Access

Emergency Department and Intensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza (MB) - Italy.

Published: September 2016

Purpose: To evaluate fluid reflux, when disconnecting syringe, for different needleless connectors.

Materials: Nine connectors were tested; 540 measurements were carried out.

Results: The connectors tested showed very different performances, about reflux, on disconnection of the syringe used for flushing.The calculated reflux volumes are: Max Zero® - BD: 6.90 (±2.47) mm3; MicroClave Clear® - ICU Medical: 6.14 (±1.46) mm3; Bionecteur® - Vygon: 1.24(±0.73) mm3; Neutron® - ICU Medical: 0.12 (±0.15) mm3; SmartSite® Carefusion: 33.51 (±11.50) mm3; Safe Plus® - Cremascoli: 23.54 (±3.56) mm3; NeutraClear® - Cair: 9.36 (±1.87) mm3; NeutroX® - Cair: 0.33 (±0.31) mm3; Dasa® BTC: 2.38 (±1.67) mm3.Differences between investigated devices were statistically significant (p<0.001).

Discussion: It is difficult to establish the best quality-price ratio for needleless connectors. It is important to consider several variable factors: continuous or discontinuous infusion, catheter type, usage environment and caliber of catheter used. It would therefore be useful to have an indication of the intraluminal space potentially affected by blood reflux in relation to a specific device.

Conclusions: Needleless connector is one of the main factors involved in keeping catheter patency. It is important to perform the best choice among the connectors available.An empirical reflux measurement, relative to the needleless connector and the catheter in use, can be obtained using an 18G cannula.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000583DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluid reflux
8
needleless connectors
8
connectors tested
8
mm3
8
icu medical
8
needleless connector
8
reflux
6
needleless
5
connectors
5
vitro evaluation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!